GURUVAYUR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,GURUVAYUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURUVAYUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CPC, directing a fresh assessment based on the outcome of the assessee's condonation of delay petition filed before the PCIT. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes pending the decision on the condonation application.
What were the facts?
The appellant, a primary agricultural credit co-operative society, filed its income tax return belatedly. Consequently, the CPC disallowed the deduction claimed under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) due to the delayed filing. The appellant subsequently filed a petition with the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax seeking condonation of this delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) can be disallowed solely for belated filing of the return, and the impact of a pending condonation of delay petition on the assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM
O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 29.11.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24.
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a primary agricultural credit co-op. society formed for providing financial assistance to its members for agricultural and allied activities and trading certain goods. The return of income along with audit report was field belatedly. The said return of income was processed by the CPC u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on 19.04.2024. The CPC disallowed the deduction claimed u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act of Rs.
The appellant filed a petition before the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) seeking condonation of delay in filing the return of income.
Since the assessee had moved petition for condonation of delay before the PCIT, the matter is restored to the file of the CPC to make fresh assessment depending upon the outcome of the condonation petition filed by the appellant before the PCIT.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes Order pronounced in the open court on 24th February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026