CORRA TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, CORPORATE WARD 1 (1) KOCHI, CORPORATE WARD KOCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's withdrawal request and the receipt of Form 2 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with the assessee retaining the liberty to approach the Tribunal if any adverse order is passed under the Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an NFAC order for AY 2021-22. During the appeal proceedings, the assessee informed the Tribunal that it had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and had received Form 2, thereby requesting to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and received Form 2 for settlement of tax liability.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 91,Section 91(2),Section 91(3),Section 92(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH : COCHIN
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
ORDER
PER SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of the NFAC, Delhi dated 17/09/2024 in respect of the A.Y. 2021-22.
When the appeal came up for hearing we noticed that the assessee filed a letter dated 21/01/2025 which reads as under:
The assessee by way of their letter dated 21/01/2025 had requested for the withdrawal of the appeal pending before this Tribunal on the ground that the assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and also furnished the form – 2 issued by the Department on 10/01/2025.
The Ld.AR submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn.
5. We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee. We have perused the said letter and recorded the request made by the assessee. We have also perused the Form 2 issued by the authority from which we came to understand that the assessee had opted to avail the benefit conferred under the VSVS scheme. In such circumstances there is no purpose in keeping the matter pending before this Tribunal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Tribunal in case of any adverse order has been passed by the authorities under the Scheme.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th April, 2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026