MALAYINKIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ITO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 457/COCH/2025Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 July 2025AY 2016-17Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

Following the jurisdictional High Court's decision in PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., the Tribunal held that interest income received from District Co-operative Banks (registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act) and Treasury is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a co-operative bank, appealed against the CIT(A)'s order regarding the non-allowance of deduction under Section 80P for interest income received from a District Co-operative Bank and Treasury. The Revenue's identical stand on this issue was challenged.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income earned by a co-operative society from District Co-operative Banks and Treasury is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 80P(2)(d),Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM

For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 22.07.2025Pronounced: 31.07.2025

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 17.01.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.

2.

I notice that the issue related to interest income received from the District Co-operative bank stands adjudicated by the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court’s decision in the case of PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. [2022] 442 ITR 141 (Ker)

& 548/Coch/2025 Malayinkil Service Co-op. Society Ltd. wherein their Lordships have rejected the Revenue’s identical stand as under: - “12.2 Section 80P deals with Co-operative Societies' computation of income. As already noted, it has four sections and several sub- sections and clauses. The Parliament has considered the various situations in which the exigible income and the deductable income of the assessee is considered while computing the income of the assessee. For getting deduction, in our considered view, the assessee must also establish that the interest income earned by the assessee is from a Co-operative Society. As a matter of fact, in the case on hand, there is no dispute that it is not from a Co-operative Society registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The interest income earned from District Co-operative Bank/State Co-operative Bank, in the facts and circumstances of the case, do come within Section 80P(2)(d). Therefore, the income constitutes income from other sources and the only eligible deduction is covered by Section 80P(2)(d) viz. Interest or dividend derived by the assessee from its investments with any other Co-operative Society. The source of interest income is from Bank and Treasury, interest income received from Treasury be included in the computation of total income of the assessee. In other words, interest earned from Treasury is inadmissible for deduction and interest income from Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act are eligible for deduction. The contra consideration of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal is incorrect and liable to be modified as stated above. Hence, it is held that the interest income earned by the assessee does not come within the ambit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and permissible deduction of interest income is limited to Co-operative Societies/Banks registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act under clause (d) of the Act and effect order on the above lines is made by the Assessing Officer. The questions are accordingly answered.”

3.

Respectfully following the above decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, I hold that the assessee is entitled for

4.

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 31st July, 2025.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →