DIVYAJYOTHI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ITO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee trust is enjoying exemption under sections 11 & 13 of the Act, the nature of expenditure (revenue or capital) is not material. The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer for the purchase of PCM textbooks was therefore not tenable.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust purchased books for its library, which the Assessing Officer treated as capital expenditure and disallowed. The CIT(A) affirmed this view. The assessee argued that as a trust enjoying exemption, the application of income is key, not the nature of expenditure. The Tribunal considered the trust's exemption status in its decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the purchase of books for a library by an educational trust enjoying tax exemption constitutes a disallowable capital expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: S/SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & PRAKASH CHAND YADAV
Per Prakash Chand Yadav, Judicial Member:
ITA No.455/Coch/2025: A.Y. 2016-17
The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-Bhubaneswar dated 20/01/2024in DIN No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1072320240(1) and relates to the assessment year 2016-17.
& 456/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19
In this appeal, there is delay of 107 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, we hereby condone the delay of 107 days and decide the matter on merits.
Brief background of the case is that the assessee has preferred this appeal against the order of the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar, who in turn affirmed the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s.143(3) of the Act dated 26.12.2018, wherein, addition of Rs.2,42,89,718/- has been made by the Assessing Officer. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has purchased certain books for library. The Assessing Officer was of the view that the books purchased by the assessee for subject Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics (PCM) text are expenditure of capital in nature and hence, same cannot be allowed as revenue expenditure.
Before the ld Addl/JCIT(A), the assessee has pointed out that in the case of Trust and hence it is the application of income which is to be considered and not the nature of expenses, whether it is in capital or in revenue field. However, the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar could not find any force in the submission of the assessee and affirmed the view of the Assessing Officer.
Aggrieved with the order of ld Addl/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar, the assessee has come in appeal before us.
& 456/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19
Ld counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the lower authorities.
Ld D.R. relied upon the orders of lower authorities.
After considering the rival submissions, we are of the opinion that the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer vis-à-vis purchase of PCM text books is not tenable inasmuch as it is an admitted fact that the assessee trust is enjoying the exemption u/s.11 & 13 of the Act.
Therefore, in our humble opinion, it hardly matter whether the expenses are incurred in revenue field or incurred in capital field. Therefore, we allow the appeal of the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed.
The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-Agra dated 31/01/2025 in DIN No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1072788329(1) and relates to the assessment year 2018-19.
In this appeal, there is also delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, we hereby condone the delay in filing the appeal and decide the matter on merits.
& 456/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19
At the outset, it is observed that the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Agra has dismissed the appeal of the assessee without condoning the delay happed before the ld Addl.JCIT(A). It is observed that the CPC order is dated 17.10.2019 and the assessee has filed the appeal somewhere in September, 2021 and from December, 2019 ut-po 28.2.2022, there was Covid period. Considering the factual aspect, we restore this matter to the file of the ld Addl/JCIT(A) after condoning the delay happened before the ld Addl/JCIT(A). Ld Addl/JCIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal of the assessee on merits.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- V3 Enterprises PVT LTD vs. The State Of ApAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- Zenith Metaplast(P) Limited vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- M/S Karo Sambhav Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Pranshu Singhal vs. Additional/Joint Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 31 Oct 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026