DIVYAJYOTHI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ITO ( EXEMPTION WARD), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 455/COCH/2025Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 August 2025AY 2016-174 pages
AI SummaryN/A

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned delays in filing both appeals. For A.Y. 2016-17, it held that the disallowance for purchasing library books was untenable, as the nature of expenditure is immaterial for a trust enjoying exemption under sections 11 and 13, thereby allowing the appeal. For A.Y. 2018-19, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Addl/JCIT(A) to decide on merits, after condoning the delay that occurred at the lower appellate level.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Divyajyothi Educational and Charitable Trust, purchased library books amounting to Rs. 2,42,89,718/-. The Assessing Officer treated this as capital expenditure, disallowing it as revenue expenditure, a view affirmed by the Addl/JCIT(A). The assessee contended that for a trust enjoying exemption under sections 11 and 13, the nature of the expense (capital or revenue) is irrelevant as it constitutes an application of income.

What were the issues?

Whether the purchase of library books by a charitable trust enjoying exemption under sections 11 and 13 constitutes an application of income or capital expenditure; and procedural aspects regarding condonation of delay in filing appeals before appellate authorities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 11,Section 13

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: S/SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & PRAKASH CHAND YADAV

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj, Sr. Advocate
For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 07.08.2025Pronounced: 20.08.2025

Per Prakash Chand Yadav, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-Bhubaneswar dated 20/01/2024in DIN No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1072320240(1) and relates to the assessment year 2016-17.

& 456/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19

2.

In this appeal, there is delay of 107 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, we hereby condone the delay of 107 days and decide the matter on merits.

3.

Brief background of the case is that the assessee has preferred this appeal against the order of the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar, who in turn affirmed the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s.143(3) of the Act dated 26.12.2018, wherein, addition of Rs.2,42,89,718/- has been made by the Assessing Officer. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has purchased certain books for library. The Assessing Officer was of the view that the books purchased by the assessee for subject Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics (PCM) text are expenditure of capital in nature and hence, same cannot be allowed as revenue expenditure.

4.

Before the ld Addl/JCIT(A), the assessee has pointed out that in the case of Trust and hence it is the application of income which is to be considered and not the nature of expenses, whether it is in capital or in revenue field. However, the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar could not find any force in the submission of the assessee and affirmed the view of the Assessing Officer.

5.

Aggrieved with the order of ld Addl/JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar, the assessee has come in appeal before us.

& 456/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19

6.

Ld counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the lower authorities.

7.

Ld D.R. relied upon the orders of lower authorities.

8.

After considering the rival submissions, we are of the opinion that the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer vis-à-vis purchase of PCM text books is not tenable inasmuch as it is an admitted fact that the assessee trust is enjoying the exemption u/s.11 & 13 of the Act.

Therefore, in our humble opinion, it hardly matter whether the expenses are incurred in revenue field or incurred in capital field. Therefore, we allow the appeal of the assessee.

9.

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed.

ITA No.456/Coch/2025: A.Y.2018-19

10.

The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-Agra dated 31/01/2025 in DIN No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1072788329(1) and relates to the assessment year 2018-19.

11.

In this appeal, there is also delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, we hereby condone the delay in filing the appeal and decide the matter on merits.

& 456/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2018-19

12.

At the outset, it is observed that the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Agra has dismissed the appeal of the assessee without condoning the delay happed before the ld Addl.JCIT(A). It is observed that the CPC order is dated 17.10.2019 and the assessee has filed the appeal somewhere in September, 2021 and from December, 2019 ut-po 28.2.2022, there was Covid period. Considering the factual aspect, we restore this matter to the file of the ld Addl/JCIT(A) after condoning the delay happened before the ld Addl/JCIT(A). Ld Addl/JCIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal of the assessee on merits.

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →