THE ACIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S. M.P. STATE COOPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION SOCIETY, BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's consistent non-appearance indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. Filing an appeal requires effective prosecution, not just submission.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT, which was adjourned twice due to the assessee's non-appearance. On the final hearing date, the assessee again failed to appear, while the revenue was represented.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the assessee can be dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’ble
PER SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM This appeal filed by the assessees emanateS from the order of the learned CIT(A)-2, Bhopal, dated 22.7.2016. M/s M.P. Vidyut Vitaran Company
At the time of hearing, none is present for the assessee
whereas Shri Lalchand, learned Sr. CIT DR is present for the revenue.
This appeal was filed by the assessees. This appeal
was earlier fixed for hearing on 26.9.2017 but on that date
the assessee did not appear. However, taking a lenient
view, this appeal was adjourned by the Bench and was directed to be fixed on 4.12.2017. On this date also, the assessee did not present. However, Shri Lalchand, learned
Senior CIT DR was present for the revenue.
From the above conduct of the asse
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026