GARGADEEN NIRANJAN LAL DATA CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the application solely on the ground of insufficient volume of charitable activities. The law does not mandate significant charitable activities for registration under Section 80G, as long as other conditions are met.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application stating that the trust had not carried out any significant charitable activities in the eight months since its inception.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 80G on the grounds of insignificant charitable activities, and if the law requires a minimum volume of activities for such registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM & SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 535/JP/2017
PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM.
This Appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(E), Jaipur
dated 27.04.2017 pertaining to A.Y. 2017-18. The Solitary ground has raised in this appeal that reads as under:-
“That the Ld. CIT(Exemption), Jaipur has erred in law as well as on the facts and circumstances of the case in rejecting the application of the assessee trust for granting of registration certificate u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Ld. CIT(Exemption) has reje
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026