HOSDURG SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO C 1068,KANHANGAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KASARAGOD, KASARAGOD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant is a co-operative society duly registered under the Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, classified as a primary agricultural credit co-operative society and it does not enjoy banking licence. The ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (supra) is squarely applicable.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society registered as a primary agricultural credit co-operative society, filed its return of income for AY 2014-15. The AO completed the assessment by denying deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i), classifying the society as a co-operative bank.
What were the issues?
Whether the appellant co-operative society is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT999 citing431 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC
- Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT631 citing384 ITR 490 · 2016 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM
Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) dated 02.09.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is co-operative society registered under the Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. It is classified as a primary agricultural credit co-operative society. The return of income for AY 2014-15 was filed on 22.11.2014 disclosing income of Rs. 7,800/- after claiming
2 Ho urg Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Kasaragod (he
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026