JOHN GEORGE,ERNAKULAM vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, accepting the medical emergency as a valid reason. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the appeal to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits after providing the assessee due opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, making variations regarding Long Term Capital Gain and disallowing set-off of losses. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's subsequent appeal in limine due to a delay of 193 days in filing.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the appeal restored for hearing on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH - DB
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM
Date of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 25.11.2025 O R D E R
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM:
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/NFAC, Delhi [‘CIT(A)’ in short] dated 22.08.2025 for Assessment Year 2018-19.
The brief facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer (A.O.) passed order u/s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) dated 22.08.2023 making variation in respect of Long term Capital Gain and variation in respect of issue of set off of losses disallowed.
Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). However, the learned CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine as the appeal has been filed late by 193 days.
Aggrieved, assessee is in appeal before us.
Before us, the Ld. AR for assessee read out para 5 of the impugned order wherein reasons for delay are recorded as medical emergency. The Ld. D.R relied upon the order of the ld.CIT(A) and pleaded for the dismissal of the appeal.
Though we some extent concur with the submissions of Ld. DR, however, keeping in mind the natural justice, we are of the view that the assessee may be granted opportunity to file submissions and evidence, if any before the ld.CIT(A). We are of the considered view that the reasons given for delay in filing appeal as medical emergency (Pg 47-48 medical certificate of paper book) cannot be ruled out. Hence, we condone the delay. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the appeal file to the Ld. CIT(A) for hearing on merits. The Ld.CIT(A) shall proceed for hearing the appeal on merits after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case with all evidence and documents, if any, forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld.CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed with the appeal proceedings on merits as per law. The Ld. AR of the assessee also assured us that the assessee will prosecute the case diligently before the Ld. CIT(A).
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25th November, 2025 at Cochin.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026