NAHAR SINGH RATHOUR,RATHOUR PARISAR VEER PARK ROA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NEEMUCH, NEEMUCH
Facts
The assessee is aggrieved by an order of the CIT(A) which upheld an assessment order. The assessee claims that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order because it sent hearing notices to an incorrect email address, which was non-functional.
Held
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's submission regarding the non-service of notices. Adhering to the principles of natural justice, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without proper service of notice on the assessee, thus violating the principles of natural justice.
Sections Cited
143(3), 147, 251(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
आदेश/ O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 14.06.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 24.12.2019 passed by learned ITO-Neemuch [“AO”] u/s 143(3)/147 of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2012-13, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
Page 1 of 3
Nahar Singh Rathour ITA No. 587/Ind/2024 - AY 2012-13
Ld. AR for assessee submits that the CIT(A), while conducting first-
appeal, has sent notices of hearing to e-mail address: amitesh@gmail.com
although the assessee has specifically mentioned email address:
amitesh@rathoure.org in the space provided in Form No. 35 for sending
notices on email. Therefore, due to non-service of notices of hearing
including the enhancement notice given by CIT(A) u/s 251(2) at the proper
email address specified by assessee, the assessee could not attend hearings
fixed by CIT(A) which has led to the passing of ex-parte order by CIT(A). He
further explained that the email id: amitesh@gmail.com to which the CIT(A)
sent notices belonged to assessee’s grandson but that email id was non-
functional and therefore the assessee mentioned new email id:
amitesh@rathoure.org which is a functional email id of assessee’s grand son.
Ld. AR pointed out that the assessee has also mentioned the very same
functional id: amitesh@rathoure.org in Form No. 36 filed to ITAT. Ld. AR, in
this situation, prays that the impugned order of first appeal passed by Ld.
CIT(A) should be set aside and the matter should be remanded back to CIT(A)
for a proper adjudication after giving proper notices to assessee.
Ld. DR for revenue agrees with the prayer of Ld. AR but makes a
request to direct the assessee to represent his case before CIT(A) and do not
seek unnecessary adjournments.
Considering above submissions and also having regard to the
principle of natural justice and fair play, we deem it fit to remand this
matter back to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication afresh. The CIT(A) shall give
Page 2 of 3
Nahar Singh Rathour ITA No. 587/Ind/2024 - AY 2012-13
necessary opportunity of hearing to assessee and pass an appropriate order
without being influenced by his earlier order in any manner. The assessee is
also directed to ensure participation in the hearings as may be fixed by
CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary adjournments failing which the CIT(A)
shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Ordered
accordingly.
Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 19/03/2025
Sd/- Sd/-
(PARESH M. JOSHI) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore
िदनांक/Dated : 19/03/2025
Patel/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYSr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 3 of 3
