MAHAVIR YUVA SARVA SHIKSHA SAMAJIK SAMITI,UJJAIN vs. CIT EXEMPTION BHOPAL, BHOPAL
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT & SHRI PARESH M JOSHIMEMBER
आदेश / O R D E R
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section 253 of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for
sake of convenience, ease and brevity) before this Tribunal. The
assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number
ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1066659678(1)dated 12.07.2024
of the Ld. CIT(Exemption), Bhopal, M.P. which is hereinafter
referred to as the “impugned order”. Page 1 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 2. FACTUAL MATRIX
2.1 That the assessee is a society registered under the Societies
Act, 1860.
2.2 That the assessee society was granted the provisional
registration under the Act by CPC vide URN No.
AADTM2702NE20213.
2.3 That the assessee society filed Form 10AB for registration
u/s 12AB of the Act.
2.4 That by an order dated 24.09.2021 the assessee society was
granted provisional registration bearing No. AADTM2702NE
20213 dated 24.09.2021 for Assessment Year 2022-23 to
Assessment Year 2024-25. The said order is at page 36 to 38 of
the paper book which is placed on record of this Tribunal. The
said order for provisional registration was subject to certain
terms and conditions which are specified in order granting
provisional registration dated 24.09.2021.
Page 2 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 2.5 When the assessee society applied for the permanent
registration u/s 12AB under the Act by filing Form 10AB certain
requisitions were made by Ld. CIT (E).
2.6 That assessee society had submitted all the documents
which they thought prudent before Ld. CIT (E) for permanent
registration.
2.7 That the assessee society is engaged in the charitable
activities i.e.
Plantation of trees. 2. Free Medical Treatment 3. Blood donation camp 4. Plastic Bags Mukt 5. Generating employment for women, distributing stitching machine to woman. 6. Maintenance of water hut 7. Provide walkers, wheel chairs for handicapped.
2.8 That Ld. CIT(E) by way of a notice bearing Number
ITBA/EXM/F/EXM43/2024-25/1064925819(1)dated 16.05.2024
while proceeding u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) with reference to their
application in form 10AB requisitioned certain documents the
Page 3 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 details of which are provided in the said notice. The copy of the
said notice is at page 5 & 6 of the PB placed on record of this
Tribunal. In particular at Sl.No.7 Ld. CIT(E) sought from the
assessee society “details of donation/grants received during last
three years with following details:- Name of Donor, address, PAN,
Mobile Number, date of donation, whether CSR donation,
corpus/Non corpus, whether Form 10BE issued”.
2.9 That the assessee society in response to the aforesaid notice
filed a reply page 7 to 8 of PB wherein all the requisition made by
Ld. CIT(E) were complied with as far as possible.
2.10 The Ld. CIT(E) however by the “impugned order” on the
grounds specified in the “impugned order” however has rejected
the application of the assessee filed in Form 10AB for grant of
registration u/s 12AB of the Act. The provisional registration u/s
12AB in Form 10AC vide URN No. AADTM2702NE20213 dated
24.09.2021 earlier granted by CPC was also cancelled.
2.11 That the assessee being aggrieved by the “impugned order”
has filed the present appeal before this Tribunal and interalia has
Page 4 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 raised following grounds of appeal in Form No.36 against the
impugned order which are as follows:-
“1. The application for permanent registration u/s 12AB in Form 10AB which is denied by Hon’ble CIT(E) and order for rejection of order u/s 12AB has been issued which is not justified.”
Record of Hearing
3.1 The hearing in the matter took place before this Tribunal on
17.03.2025, when the Ld. AR for and on the behalf of the
assessee appeared and interalia contended that “Impugned
Order” of Ld. CIT(E) is illegal, bad in law and not proper and that
the same should be set aside by this tribunal in exercise of its
appellate jurisdiction conferred upon them under the Act. The Ld.
CIT(E) in the “impugned order” has recorded that a requisition
was made to the assessee society to provide details of donation
received and paid during the last 3 financial years with complete
details, however the assessee in reply while enclosing the list of
donors have not furnished donor’s PAN details and so also their
address. Under these circumstances the Ld. CIT(E) has held that
genuineness of donations could not be verified and on this
ground alone their application for registration u/s 12AB was
rejected and so also provisional registration earlier granted in
Page 5 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 Form 10AC. The Ld. AR during the course of the argument
invited our attention to page 25 to 30 which is donation list
200-21 of the assessee society containing names of 253 persons
who had donated various amount to the assessee society. It was
brought to our notice that small amounts came to be donated by
these persons Rs. 1100/- to Rs.2000/- and aggregate amount
comes to Rs.3,85,000/- from total 253 persons. It was
contended that these amounts from 253 persons are meager
amount and to insist for PAN number of these persons and
address would indeed cause grave hardship to them, due to very
nature of meager amounts involved in donation. Correspondingly
the Ld. AR invited our attention to Auditor Report as on
31.03.2021 page 39 to 42 of PB and demonstrated that aggregate
amount of Rs.3,85,000/- is clearly stated under income column
as having been received as and by way of donation. Similar
exercise was done by Ld. AR for donation list for the year 2021-
22 wherein the amount of Rs.1,49,221/- was received from total
96 persons (page 31 to 33 of PB) with Auditor Report at page 43
to 49 for the year ended 31.03.2022 wherein too the amount of
Rs.1,49,221/- is reflected as and by way of donation under
Page 6 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 income column. Correspondingly in Audit Report for the year
ended 31.03.2022 the amount of Rs.1,49,221/- is reflected (page
43 to 45 of PB). The Ld. AR for the financial year 2022-23 invited
our attention to the donation list (page 34 to 35 of PB) wherein
there are total 58 person who in aggregate have paid Rs.87,571/-
and that the same are reflected in audit report for the year ended
on 31.03.2023 (page 46 to 48 of PB). The sheet anchor of Ld. AR
argument was that small amounts are received by assessee
society ranging from Rs.1100/- to Rs,2000/- and non furnishing
of PAN details and address of such donor’s should not lead to
non registration U/s 12AB as amount donated by person is too
meager. The Ld. AR then contended that object and genuineness
of the trust/society is required to be seen in law and perse Ld.
CIT(E) has not recorded anything adverse against the
assessee/society in the impugned order. In fact object
genuineness is not questioned at all in the proceedings. Per
contra Ld. DR interalia has contended that in so far as object and
genuineness of assessee society is concerned while it is true that
there are no findings in the “impugned order” however this
aspect can be seen afresh by Ld. CIT(E) in event this Tribunal set
Page 7 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 aside the impugned order and on remand of proceeding Ld. CIT
(E) can examine said issue. In the rejoinder argument Ld. AR
stated that assessee society has all “Receipts” of donation and
that same can be shown to Ld. CIT (E). The Ld. CIT(E) however
should not insist for PAN details and address of donor’s as
amount paid by each of the donor is very small but for a good
cause.
Observations,findings & conclusions.
4.1 We now have to decide the legality, validity and proprietary
of the “Impugned Order” basis records of the case and
contentions canvassed before us.
4.2 We have carefully perused records of the case. We are of the
considered view after examining the rival contentions that it
would be just, fair and convenient and so also in the interest of
ends of justice that the impugned order be set aside and matter
be remanded back to the file of CIT(E) to examine the whole issue
afresh and then to pass a fresh order by taking overall facts and
circumstances of the case together including the issue of object
and genuineness of the activities of the assessee society.
Page 8 of 9
Mahavir Yuva Sarva Shiksha Samajik Samiti ITA No. 561/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 4.3 In the premises drawn up by us, we set aside the impugned
order and remand the case back to CIT(E) on denovo basis who
shall take into consideration overall gamut of the case into
consideration and then shall pass a reasoned order.
Order
5.1 In result appeal of Assessee is allowed as and by way of
remand on denovo basis.
5.2 Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 20.03.2025.
Sd/- Sd/-
(BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI) (PARESH M JOSHI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Indore िदनांक /Dated : 20/03/2025 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 9 of 9