MAHARSHI SHRING SAMAJOTTHAN SAMITI,UJJAIN vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

PDF
ITA 589/IND/2024Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 March 2025AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI (Accountant Member), SHRI PARESH M JOSHI (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The assessee, a society, applied for final registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application after the assessee failed to provide complete details regarding donations, despite multiple opportunities and notices. The assessee contended that they missed the notice due to an email oversight.

Held

The Tribunal held that the impugned order rejecting the application for registration was not justified. It acknowledged the assessee's plea of a bonafide oversight and the need for an opportunity to present all details.

Key Issues

Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the registration application for non-compliance without granting adequate opportunity? Whether the assessee's oversight in responding to notices was bonafide?

Sections Cited

253, 12AB, 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT & SHRI PARESH M JOSHIMEMBER

For Appellant: Ms. Sonam Khandelwal, AR
For Respondent: Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR
Hearing: 20.03.2025Pronounced: 21.03.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:

This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section 253 of

the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for

sake of convenience, ease and brevity) before this Tribunal. The

assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number

ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1066567176(1)dated 10.07.2024

of Ld. CIT(Exemption), Bhopal, M.P. which has rejected the Page 1 of 7

Maharshi Shring Samajotthan Samiti ITA No. 589/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 application of the assessee in Form 10AB for grant of final

registration u/s 12AB of the Act which is hereinafter referred to

as the “impugned order”.

2.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2.1 That the assessee is a society registered by “Registrar

Societies”, Govt. of M.P bearing Registration Number

07/33/01/15151/18 dated 30.11.2018.

2.2 That the assessee society was granted the provisional

registration under the Act vide URN:- AARAM1662QE20221. The

date of provisional registration was 24.03.2023and the

Assessment for which provisional registration was granted was

from Assessment Year 2023-24 to Assessment Year 2025-2026.

2.3 That thereafter the assessee society applied in Form 10AB

for final registration u/s 12AB under the new provisions of

Income Tax Act 1961.

2.4 That an opportunity letter was issued to the assessee dated

16.05.2024 calling upon the assessee to place on record certain

details along with the documents (Page 1 to 2 of PB).

Page 2 of 7

Maharshi Shring Samajotthan Samiti ITA No. 589/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 2.5 That by way of a reply on page 3 to 4 of paper book the

assessee society submitted all the details and documents which

they thought it to be prudent before Ld. CIT(E) for purposes of

the permanent registration.

2.6 That the Ld. CIT(E) vide notice dated 02.07.2024 made

following requisitions to the assessee society :-

“i. Please provide following details regarding donations received during the last three financial years. Name of the donor, complete address, mobile number, Date, Donation amount, mode of donation, whether corpus donation? ii. As per donation list already provided, the society has shown corpus donation of Rs.15,59,100/- received from Shri Anil Upadhyay. However, the corpus donation of Rs.15,59,100/- was not shown in Audit Report. Please explain the same.” 2.7 That the assessee did not file any reply to the notice dated

02.07.2024 and further it is required to be noted that the above

details were too sought vide earlier notice dated 16.05.2024

which too remained un-complied with by the assessee society.

The proper address and PAN Numbers of donors ultimately were

not provided by the assessee to Ld. CIT(E) despite 2 requests

(supra). The Ld. CIT(E) under these peculiar facts and the

Page 3 of 7

Maharshi Shring Samajotthan Samiti ITA No. 589/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 circumstances by “Impugned Order” rejected the application of

the assessee filed in Form 10AB for grant of final registration u/s

12AB of the Act.

2.8 That the assessee being aggrieved by the “impugned order”

has filed the present appeal before this Tribunal and interalia has

raised following grounds of appeal in Form No.36 against the

impugned order which are as follows:-

“1. The application for permanent registration u/s 12AB in Form 10AB, which is denied by Hon’ble CIT Exemptions and order for rejection of u/s 12AB has been issued which is not justified.”

3.

Record of Hearing

3.1 The hearing in the matter took place before this Tribunal on

20.03.2025, when the Ld. AR for and on the behalf of the

assessee appeared and interalia contended that “Impugned

Order” of Ld. CIT(E) is illegal, bad in law and not proper and that

the same should be set aside by this tribunal in exercise of its

appellate jurisdiction conferred upon them under the Act. It was

contended by the Ld. AR that notice dated 02.07.2024 by virtue

of which certain requisitions (supra) were made was omitted to

have been seen (missed out) by assessee society on e-mail and

Page 4 of 7

Maharshi Shring Samajotthan Samiti ITA No. 589/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 apart from this notice, no other notice came to be issued to the

assessee society. The Ld. AR fairly pleaded that for such a

bonafide failure to ‘see the notice’ dated 02.07.2024 on e-mail

they should not face rejection of final registration u/s 12AB of

the Act. Such an action on part of the Revenue is punitive action

which entails serious civil consequences to the assessee society.

It was also pleaded by Ld. AR that last 3 years Audit Report were

placed on record before Ld. CIT(E), however details of the

donations could not be provided at the relevant time. The Ld. AR

has shown to this Tribunal “Donation receipt booklet” and has

undertaken before us that it would be submitted and produced

before Ld. CIT(E) if one and final opportunity is afforded to them.

The Ld. AR finally has prayed that the “Impugned Order” be set

aside as and by way of Remand.

3.2 Per contra Ld. DR for and on behalf of the Revenue has not

seriously objected to the contention of Ld. AR but has submitted

that the assessee society should have complied with providing

donation list along with all material particulars as was sought by

Ld. CIT(E). All other requisitions so made with regard to

donation amount of Rs.15,59,100/- too should have been

Page 5 of 7

Maharshi Shring Samajotthan Samiti ITA No. 589/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 complied with without any demur. In rejoinder the Ld. AR

undertook before this Tribunal that if one last opportunity is

granted to them they would comply with all the sought

requisitions and would explain facts of the case in detailed

manner. In brief Ld. AR wanted one more opportunity in order to

meet ends of justice.

4.

Observations,findings & conclusions.

4.1 We now have to examine the legality, validity and

proprietary of the “Impugned Order” basis records of the case and

contentions canvassed before us.

4.2 We have carefully perused records of the case. We are of the

considered view after examining the rival contentions that it

would be just, fair and convenient and so also in the interest of

ends of justice that the impugned order be set aside and matter

be remanded back to the file of CIT(E) to examine the whole issue

afresh and then to pass a fresh order by taking overall facts and

circumstances of the case together.

4.3 In the premises drawn up by us, we set aside the impugned

order and remand the case back to CIT(E) on denovo basis who

shall take into consideration overall gamut of the case into

Page 6 of 7

Maharshi Shring Samajotthan Samiti ITA No. 589/Ind/2024 – AY 2024-25 consideration and then shall pass a reasoned order in

accordance with law.

5.

Order

5.1 In result appeal of Assessee is allowed as and by way of

remand on denovo basis.

5.2 Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in open court on 21.03.2025.

Sd/- Sd/-

(BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI) (PARESH M JOSHI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Indore िदनांक /Dated : 21/03/2025 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore

Page 7 of 7

MAHARSHI SHRING SAMAJOTTHAN SAMITI,UJJAIN vs CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL | BharatTax