BHAVNABEN JIGISHBHAI DOSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once the dispute was settled under VSVS, the penalty proceedings became infructuous and could not be continued. Therefore, the penalty order was unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee's quantum appeal was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS). Despite this settlement, the Assessing Officer levied a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) and the CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal against it.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty proceedings can be sustained after the underlying dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order dated 05.07.2022 passed by the CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the Assessment Year 2016-17.
The assessee has raised the following ground of appeal :-
“1. Under the facts, in law and circumstances of the case, levy of penalty of Rs.46,72,926/- is without verification of submission and records available on site and therefore be deleted.”
The assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was passed on 07.12.2018 wherein total income of the assessee was determined at Rs.4,04,15,480/-. The assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) vide order dated 31.07.2019 dismissed the appeal of the assessee. In the meanwhile, penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was initiated. The assessee has opted for “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme” (VSVS) on 17.12.2020 and filed quantum appeal prior to that on 01.10.2019. During the hearing of the penalty proceedings the Page 2 of 3 assessee submitted that Form Nos.1 & 2 of VSVS has been filed. The Assessing Officer proceeded with penalty proceedings and levied penalty of Rs.46,72,926/- on 25.03.2022.
Being aggrieved by the penalty order, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
The Ld. AR submitted that once the quantum appeal including the dispute has been settled through VSVS thereby Form No.5 has been issued on 19.10.2021 by the PCIT-3, Ahmedabad, then the penalty does not sustain as the very quantum has been settled. Ld. AR submitted that the CIT(A) also mentioned about the settlement of dispute but dismissed the appeal of the assessee on penalty issue.
The Ld. DR relied upon the assessment order, penalty order and the order of the CIT(A).
Heard both the parties and perused all the relevant material available on record. The assessee has filed quantum appeal before the Tribunal on 01.10.2019 and the application of VSVS in Form No.1, 2 & 3 in quantum proceedings were filed before the Tribunal on 17.12.2020. Certificate in Form No.3 from Designated Authority was received on 29.12.2020. The assessee filed letter for withdrawal of quantum appeal on 04.01.2021 and filed Form No.4 under VSVS after payment of taxes of Rs.65,00,000/- on 08.01.2021. The assessee filed submissions letter on 19.05.2021 to National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) in penalty proceedings alog with Form Nos.1, 2, 3 & 4 of the VSVS on 19.05.2021. Subsequently, Form No.5 was issued by the PCIT-3, Ahmedabad on 19.10.2021 which means that before finalisation of penalty the dispute was settled in respect of oral quantum itself. Once the dispute is settled, the authority cannot continue with penalty proceedings but the same was rejected by the Assessing Officer without assigning any reason as to why the penalty has been imposed on the assessee vide order dated 25.03.2020. The CIT(A) simply dismissed the appeal of the assessee but the fact remains that since the penalty become infructuous the matter in respect of penalty has to be allowed. Hence, the present appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 30th day of November, 2022.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026