NEK KARYA SEWA SAMITI,INDORE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

PDF
ITA 85/IND/2025Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 March 2025AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI (Accountant Member), SHRI PARESH M JOSHI (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The assessee, Nek Karya Sewa Samiti, applied for regular registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application due to non-submission of donation details, leading to the cancellation of its provisional registration.

Held

The Tribunal held that the order of the CIT(Exemption) violated principles of natural justice. The assessee undertook to submit all requisite donation details, and thus the matter was remanded back to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh decision.

Key Issues

Whether the CIT(Exemption) order rejecting the registration application without providing sufficient opportunity was valid? Whether the case should be remanded for fresh consideration after submission of missing documents?

Sections Cited

253, 1961, 12AB, 10AB, 10AC

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargia, AR
For Respondent: Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR
Hearing: 25.03.2025Pronounced: 25.03.2025

आदेश / O R D E R

Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:

This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section 253 of

the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for

sake of brevity) before this Tribunal. The assessee is aggrieved by

the order bearing Number ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-

24/1061948928(1)dated 04.03.2024 of the Ld. CIT(Exemption),

Page 1 of 7

Nek Karya Sewa Samiti ITA No. 428/Ind/2024 Bhopal, M.P. which is hereinafter referred to as the “impugned

order”.

Registry informed that there is delay of 4 days in filing the

appeal. Delay of 4 days condoned for which assessee has shown

sufficient cause. Appeal admitted and taken up for hearing.

2.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2.1 The appellant is a Society, registered under the Madhya

Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 1973 vide certificate of Regn.

No. 03/27/03/15206/12 Dated 09/05/2012 and has

provisionally registered under Section 12A having provisional

Registration No. AAEAN1998BE20211 from AY-2022-23 to AY

2024-25 through order of CIT exemption dated 07/04/2022.

2.2 The objective of the Society is to make available free of cost

food packet to poor or lower-class students, Schools, hospital and

various distribution centre in city and to spread awareness

towards Medicine and Health in general. Society also provides

Medical Facility for CT-scan and MRI at free of cost or

concessional rate.

Page 2 of 7

Nek Karya Sewa Samiti ITA No. 428/Ind/2024 2.3 The assessee applied for regular registration under clause (iii)

of sub-section C of section 12AB(1) of the act, as per the new

provision of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Form 10AB on 30

September 2023 via Ack No. 373639010300923.

2.4 Consequently, opportunity letters were issued and various

documents/details were called for; to process the said application

on 04 December 2023 but due to Asses portal issues, assessee

could not access to the same on time. On 16 January 2024

assessee submitted the response along with the documents.

2.5 On 30 December 2023 & 19 February 2024 assessee again

received notices but no further documents/details were called

for. However, assessee again responded with all the documents

which were earlier submitted on 16 January 2024.

2.6 Assessee submitted reply it also requested to allow more

time to submit the donation details but no response was given

and order for rejection was issued.

2.7 On 04 March 2024 assessee received the rejection order in

Form 10AD stating that -

Page 3 of 7

Nek Karya Sewa Samiti ITA No. 428/Ind/2024

- Assessee has not submitted the donation details and

resubmitted the previous documents only.

- Assessee has submitted incomplete reply and requested to

allow more time to submit the donation details.

2.8 The application of the assessee in Form 10AB for grant of

registration u/s 12AB is rejected and the provisional

registration/approval u/s 12AB in Form 10 AC vide URN No.

AAEAN1998BE20211 dated 07.04.2022 is also cancelled saying

that non-compliance of required documents/information.

2.9 That the aforesaid order bears Number

ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/1061948928(1) and same is

dated 04.03.2024 (the impugned order) supra.

2.10 That the assessee being aggrieved by the impugned order

has preferred an appeal before this Tribunal and has raised

following grounds of appeal in Form No.36 which are as under:-

Page 4 of 7

Nek Karya Sewa Samiti ITA No. 428/Ind/2024

"1. The details of donation received could not be submitted. However, due to oversight, this compliance was missed for which we deeply regret. The audit report was attached from where the receipts can be seen. All donations were received through banking channel only. The society has now compiled the details and are ready for submission."

3.

Record of Hearing

3.1 The hearing in the matter took place before us on

25.03.2025, when the Ld. AR for and on the behalf of the

assessee interalia contended that "Impugned Order" of Ld.

CIT(E) is in violation of principles of natural justice and is

therefore bad in law, illegal and not proper. It deserves to be set

aside by this Tribunal in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction.

The Ld. AR fairly conceded that no doubt donation details were

sought by Ld. CIT(E) at the material time but since the same were

not available at the material time it could not be supplied

however the same are available now and if this Tribunal is

pleased to set aside the impugned order then in the proposed

remand proceedings before CIT(E) they would submit the same

without any demur. Per contra Ld. DR for and on behalf of the

Revenue did not strongly oppose the contention of the Ld. AR and

Page 5 of 7

Nek Karya Sewa Samiti ITA No. 428/Ind/2024 finally left it to this Tribunal to take appropriate call on this issue

in accordance with law. In rejoinder Ld. AR submitted that they

indeed regret non compliance on part of the assessee but

asserted that in Audit Report donation amount could be seen as

having been received through normal banking channels. The

assessee has now compiled the details and that they are ready to

submit the same.

4.

Observations,findings & conclusions.

4.1 We now have to decide the legality, validity and proprietary

of the “Impugned Order” basis records of the case and

contentions canvassed before us.

4.2 We have minutely perused records of the case and have

heard the rival submissions.

4.3 We are of the considered opinion that since Ld. AR has

under taken before us that the assessee would file all requisite

details of donation as requisitioned by CIT (E) it would be just

fair and convenient and in the interest of ends of justice that

impugned order be set aside and matter be remanded back to file

of CIT(E) to pass a fresh order on denovo basis after assessee has

Page 6 of 7

Nek Karya Sewa Samiti ITA No. 428/Ind/2024 submitted all details as sought. Hence we set aside the

“impugned order” as and by way of Remand on denovo basis.

5.

Order

5.1 In the premises “impugned order” is set aside as and by

way of remand on denovo basis.

5.2 Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in open court on 25.03.2025.

Sd/- Sd/-

(BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI) (PARESH M JOSHI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Indore िदनांक /Dated :25/03/2025 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore

Page 7 of 7

NEK KARYA SEWA SAMITI,INDORE vs CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL, BHOPAL | BharatTax