MR. UTTAM KUMAR MONDAL,ASANSOL vs. ITO, WARD - 2(2) , ASANSOL

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. There is no petition for adjournment either. Under these circumstances, we dispose off the case ex-parte, on merits, qua the assessee after hearing the ld. Departmental Representative.

The assessee has filed an application under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme” and submitted that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. The ld. D/R submitted that she has no objection if the prayer of the assessee is accepted, subject to a rider that, the same should be restored, in case the application for settlement of dispute under the scheme is not accepted by the competent authorities.

Heard the ld. D/R. The assessee filed a letter dt. 28/10/2020 for withdrawal of the appeal stating that he has preferred an application the “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme”. The letter is extracted under:-

Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal 5.1. After perusing the application filed by the After perusing the application filed by the assessee, we dismiss we dismiss this appeal of the assessee as withdrawn with a as withdrawn with a protection that, the assessee will be at liberty to apply for will be at liberty to apply for restoration of this appeal so dismissed, in case the application made by the assessee so dismissed, in case the application made by the assessee so dismissed, in case the application made by the assessee under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme” “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme” is not accepted by the competent authorities. is not accepted by the competent authorities.