M/S. GOLD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer's file, directing him to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present its case. The assessee was also directed to appear and explain its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a company engaged in motor parts trading, filed its return of income. The Assessing Officer made significant additions to the declared income. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions and dismissed the assessee's appeal ex parte as no one appeared.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex parte order of the CIT(A) was justified and if the assessee should be granted a further opportunity to present its case before the Assessing Officer.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. R. K. PANDA & SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the exparte order dated 03.01.2017 of the CIT(A)-16, New Delhi relating to A. Y. 2011-12. 2. There is delay of 13 days in filing of this appeal by the assessee for which the assessee has filed a condonation petition explaining the reasons for delay. After considering the contents of the condonation petition and after hearing the Ld. DR, the delay in filing of this appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for hearing. 3. The assessee in its various grounds of appeal has challenged the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the various additions made by the Assessing Officer.
4. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a company engaged in the business of trading in motor parts and accessories. It filed its return of income on 25.09.2011 declaring total income of Rs.76,45,370/-. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment determining the total income at Rs.4,01,11,450/- by making an addition of Rs.3,24,66,081/-. Since none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite repeated opportunities granted the Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the various additions made by the Assessing Officer and thereby dismissed the appeal.
5. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
6. We have heard the rival arguments made by both the sides. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that given an opportunity, the assessee is in a position to explain his case. He submitted that the Assessing Officer had not given effective opportunities and the Ld. CIT(A) has decided the appeal exparte and, therefore, in the interest of justice the matter should be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer.
7. The Ld. DR on the other hand while opposing the prayer of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that she has no objection if the matter is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer.
8. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the Assessing Officer and explain its case failing which the Assessing Officer is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised
by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purpose.
9. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 08.07.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026