RAHUL JAIN,JAORA DISTRICT RATLAM vs. ITO 2 RATLAM, RATLAM
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which had dismissed the assessee's appeal against an assessment order passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order treated a cash deposit of Rs. 20,00,414/- as unexplained money under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE.
Held
The Tribunal held that the impugned assessment order was passed under Section 144 of the Act due to non-compliance by the assessee. However, the assessee submitted 12 new documents before the Tribunal that were not produced before the AO or CIT(A). Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the matter back to the AO for a de novo assessment, considering all the material.
Key Issues
Whether the assessment order passed ex-parte under Section 144 is valid when new evidence is produced before the appellate tribunal? Whether the additions under Section 69A and the consequential levy of tax under Section 115BBE are justified?
Sections Cited
253, 144, 142(1), 69A, 115BBE, 246A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section 253 of
the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for sake of
brevity) before this Tribunal. The assessee is aggrieved by the
order bearing Number ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/
1064232917(1) dated 19.04.2024 of Ld. CIT(A) passed u/s 250 of
the Act which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned order”.
Page 1 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
The relevant Assessment Year is 2017-18 and the corresponding
previous year period is from 01.04.2016 to 31.03.2017.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2.1 That by an assessment order bearing Number:
ITBA/AST/S/144/20919-201018756389(1) dated 10.10.2019
the income of the assessee was computed at Rs.20,00,414/- u/s
144 of the Act. It is required to be noted that in the assessment
order it is recorded that notice u/s 142(1) dated 12.03.2018
requesting the assessee to file return of income for Assessment
Year 2017-18 was not complied with. It is also recorded that
since the assessee has deliberately failed to file the return of
income and has failed to comply with the notice u/s 142(1) of the
Act it is clear that the assessee has no explanation to offer about
the source of cash deposit of Rs.20,00,414/- in
Central Bank of India, Jaora, M.P. It is also recorded that
additionally one more opportunity was afforded to the assessee
u/s 142(1) of the Act along with a show cause notice as to why
amount of cash deposit in the bank account (supra) as per
information available with the department should not be treated
as unaccounted income. However even this opportunity was not
Page 2 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
availed off by the assessee and no response from the assessee
came forth. Hence assessment was carried out u/s 144 of the Act.
2.2 In the assessment order at para 7.1 it is recorded as
follows:-
“7.1 During the proceedings, the information regarding bank account hold by the assessee has been obtained and verified. On verification of the said bank account statement(s), it is seen that, following amount(s) has been credited in the relevant bank (related to Assessment Year 2017-18):- S.No. Bank Name Branch Account Total amount Number of credited in account 1 Central 7 Jawahar 3556339200 Rs.20,00,414/- Bank of Path, Jaora India
2.3 In the assessment order at para 7.2 it is also recorded as
under:-
“7.2. In view of non-compliance from the assesse, it is clear that the assesse has no any explanation to offer regarding nature and source of above amount credited in the assessee's own bank account. Therefore, the above amount of Rs 20,00414/-credited into assessee's bank account, is herewith treated as Unexplained Money under Section 69A, read with Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1951, for the year under consideration.”
2.4 In final analysis total income of the assessee was computed
as under at para 9 of the assessment order as under:-
Page 3 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
“9. In view of the above, total income of the assessee
is assessed/computed as under:
1 Unexplained money under Section 69A Rs.20,00,414/- read with Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2 Assessed Income Rs.20,00,414/-
2.5 In the assessment order it is also recorded at para 10 that
addition has been made under Section 69A of the Act and that
tax is payable under Section 115BBE of the Act.
2.6 That aforesaid assessment order is hereinafter referred to as
the “Impugned Assessment Order”.
“Impugned 2.7 That the assessee being aggrieved by the
Assessment Order” prefers first appeal u/s 246 A of the Act
before Ld. CIT(A) who by the impugned order has dismissed the
appeal of the assessee.
2.8 That the assessee being aggrieved by the “Impugned
Order” has preferred present Second appeal before us and has
raised following grounds of appeal in Form No.36 against the
impugned order which are as under:-
“1 GROUND NO. 01: That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not holding that the order passed U/s. 144 is wrong and invalid.
Page 4 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
2 GROUND NO. 02 That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) also erred in not holding that the addition made U/s. 69A at Rs. 20,00,414/- on account of amount deposited in bank account of the appellant with Central Bank of India, Jaora, and also levying of the tax thereon U/s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act both are wrong, invalid and unjustified. 3 PRAYER: That the appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or modify all or any of the above grounds of appeal at any time before the completion of the hearing.”
Recording of Hearing
3.1 The hearing in the matter took place before this Tribunal on
08.04.2025 where none appeared on behalf of the assessee. The
assessee however has placed on record a written submission in
hindi along with documents like Balance Sheet, Trading Account,
Bank statement etc. totalling 12 separate documents. Per contra
Ld. DR for and on behalf of the Revenue has interalia contended
that the impugned assessment order is passed u/s 144 of the Act
and assessee has remained totally non compliant despite notice.
The assessee has not availed any opportunity whatsoever despite
opportunities after opportunities at original stage of proceedings
itself. The Ld. Assessing Officer was therefore left with no other
alternative but to pass order u/s 144 of the Act.
Page 5 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
3.2 The Ld. DR basis impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) has
contended that written submissions two in number were filed by
the assessee and basis that it was expected that a detailed order
on merits of the case would be passed. However in written
submissions so filed which are reproduced in the impugned order
there is no valid explanation at all on merits of the case. No
material with credence was placed on record to dislodge the
impugned assessment order. The Ld. DR then contended that
written submissions filed before this Tribunal along with 12 new
documents were neither before the Ld. A.O nor were before Ld.
CIT(A). Under these circumstances he finally contended that
impugned order be set aside and matter is send back to Ld. A.O
to pass a fresh order on merits after taking into consideration
fresh material so placed now before this Tribunal.
Observations,findings & conclusions.
4.1 We now have to decide the legality, validity and the
proprietary of the “Impugned Order” basis records of the case and
rival submissions canvassed before us by both Ld. AR and Ld.
DR.
Page 6 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
4.2 We have carefully perused the records of the case and have
minutely examined the same.
4.3 We basis records of the case, contentions canvassed before
us and so also after carefully perusing the written submissions
along with 12 documents filed before us, are of the considered
view that impugned order deserves to be set aside as the
“Impugned Assessment Order” was u/s 144 of the Act as these
12 documents which is now filed before us were not before Ld.
A.O at original assessment stage. We further note that even
before Ld. CIT(A) these 12 documents were not placed on record
which assessee could have done so. Under these circumstances
we are of the considered view that there is no effective
meritorious disposal of either the original assessment order nor
first appellate order and computation of income has been done
not in meritorious manner for which much fault is of assessee
only as assessee was in slumber mode. It is only now he has
awaken to realities. Hence impugned order is set aside and
matter is remanded back to Ld. A.O on denovo basis. The Ld.
A.O shall accept all material placed before us and after carrying
out detailed examination and verification of same would suitably
Page 7 of 8
Rahul Jain ITA No. 500/Ind/2024 - A.Y.2017-18
pass a fresh order. The assessee is directed to cooperate with the
department and ensure that passing of assessment order on
denovo basis is not further delayed. Needless to state in revenue
matter both assessee and Department must cooperate with each
other for good.
Order
5.1 Impugned order is set aside as and by way of remand on
denovo basis.
5.2 Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 23.04.2025.
Sd/- Sd/-
(BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI) (PARESH M JOSHI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Indore िदनांक/ Dated : 23/04/2025 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 8 of 8
