CHANCHAL NALWAYA,INDORE vs. ITO 3(3), INDORE
Facts
The assessee filed her return for AY 2013-14, which was subjected to scrutiny. A revision order under Section 263 directed a fresh assessment, leading to a higher total income. The assessee's first appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte.
Held
The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) decided the appeal ex-parte without the assessee making submissions, despite opportunities given over several years and a delay due to the pandemic. Considering principles of natural justice, the matter was remanded.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) rightly decided the appeal ex-parte and if the grounds raised by the assessee require adjudication on merit after providing an opportunity of hearing.
Sections Cited
143(3), 263, 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
आदेश/ O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 05.06.2023 passed by
learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”] which
in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 12.12.2018 passed by learned
ITO-3(3), Indore [“AO”] u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the
Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2013-14, the assessee has filed this appeal
on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
Page 1 of 4
Chanchal Nalwaya ITA No. 296/Ind/2023 - AY 2013-14
The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the
assessee-individual filed her return of income of AY 2013-14 on 31.03.2014
declaring a total income of Rs. 2,87,590/-. The case was subjected to
scrutiny assessment and the AO passed assessment-order u/s 143(3) on
17.03.2016 assessing total income at Rs. 12,67,527/- after making
additions on account of long-term capital gain and interest income.
Subsequently, the PCIT-I, Indore passed revision-order u/s 263 on
16.03.2018 directing the AO to make fresh assessment after taking stamps
duty value of Rs. 1,86,30,000/- in computing capital gain. Pursuant to such
revision-order, the AO passed fresh assessment-order dated 12.12.2018 re-
determining total income at Rs. 83,97,530/-. Aggrieved by order of fresh
assessment, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal before CIT(A) but did
not get any relief. Now, the assessee has come in next appeal before us
assailing the order of CIT(A).
On hearing learned Representatives of both sides, it emerges that the
CIT(A) has decided first-appeal ex-parte qua assessee for the reason that the
assessee did not make any submission before him despite opportunities
given. It is further observed that the CIT(A) fixed initial hearings during the
years 2019 / 2020 and thereafter fixed final opportunity on 15.05.2023 after
a gap of about 3 years and after passing of Covid-2019 pandemic. Ld. AR for
Page 2 of 4
Chanchal Nalwaya ITA No. 296/Ind/2023 - AY 2013-14
assessee submits that the assessee was not able to make representation qua
the notice dated 15.05.2023 which has led to passing of impugned order ex-
parte. Ld. AR further submits that the CIT(A) has simply confirmed the order
passed by AO and thereby upheld the additions but the grounds/issues
raised by assessee in first-appeal requires an apt adjudication by CIT(A) on
merit in accordance with provisions of 250(6) of the Act which provides “The
order of the Commissioner (Appeals) disposing of the appeal shall be in
writing and shall state the points for determination, the decision thereon and
the reason for the decision.”. Accordingly, in this situation, Ld. AR prays that
the present matter should be remanded to CIT(A) for an apt adjudication on
merit. He asserted in open court that the assessee is ready and willing to
make representation before CIT(A) if an opportunity is given.
Ld. DR for revenue expressed no objection against remanding this
matter to CIT(A) but makes a request to direct the assessee to represent her
case before CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary adjournments.
Considering above submissions of parties and also having regard to
the principle of natural justice and fair play, we deem it fit to remand this
matter back to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication afresh. The CIT(A) shall give
necessary opportunity of hearing to assessee and pass an appropriate order
uninfluenced by his earlier order. The assessee is also directed to ensure
Page 3 of 4
Chanchal Nalwaya ITA No. 296/Ind/2023 - AY 2013-14
participation in the hearings as may be fixed by CIT(A) and do not seek
unnecessary adjournments failing which the CIT(A) shall be at liberty to
pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.
Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 28/04/2025
Sd/- Sd/-
(PARESH M. JOSHI) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore
िदनांक/Dated : 28/04/2025
Patel/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYSr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 4 of 4
