RSRG DEVBUILD P. LTD,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(1), INDORE
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI, & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI,
आदेश/O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 26.12.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“CIT(A)”] by which the penalty-order dated 01.09.2022 passed by ITO, 4(1), Indore [“AO”] imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the act”] has been upheld, the assessee has filed this appeal on following grounds:
Page 1 of 4
RSRG Devbuild Private Limited ITA No.6/Ind/2025 Assessment year 2014-15 “1. The order of the Ld. NFAC is illegal and bad in law since the notices were not served physically but issued on e-mail. 1.1 The Ld. CIT NFAC has erred in passing the order the notice 142(1) was issued which could not be complied with because of hospitalisation of the counsel who ultimatly passed away. Since, there was a reasonable cause non compliance and as such the penalty levied may please be cancelled. 2. The Ld. CIT NFAC has erred in maintaining the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) when the quantum appeal is pending before the Ld. CIT(A). 3. The penalty u/s 271(1)(b) may please be cancelled. 4. The assessee craves to amend, alter or delete any of the ground of appeal.”
Heard the learned Representatives of both sides and the case records
perused.
Ld. AR for assessee at first carried us to the penalty order dated
01.09.2022 passed by AO to demonstrate that the AO has imposed penalty
for assessee’s failure to comply with the notice dated 13.03.2022 u/s 142(1)
of the Act. Thereafter, he submitted with a heavy heart that the said failure
on the part of assessee had in fact occurred due to the hospitalization and
demise of the regular counsel of assessee, Shri Sandeep Deshpande (son of
Ld. AR himself). Therefore, Ld. AR submitted that there was a reasonable
cause on the part of assessee for occurrence of failure and the assessee is
entitled to the benefit of section 273B which must be given. Ld. AR further
submitted that due to the demise of counsel, no reply could be filed to the
AO in response to the notice issued u/s 274 r.w.s. section 271(1)(b) for
Page 2 of 4
RSRG Devbuild Private Limited ITA No.6/Ind/2025 Assessment year 2014-15 imposition of penalty. Ld. AR prayed to delete the penalty having regard to
the provision of section 273B.
Ld. DR for revenue was fair enough in not raising any objection to the
submissions and prayer made by Ld. AR.
We refer the provision of section 273B reading as under:
“273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of
clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 271, ……., no penalty shall
be imposable on the person or the assessee, as the case may be,
for any failure referred to in the said provisions if he proves
that there was reasonable cause for the said failure.”
In present case, we find that as per explanation made by Ld. AR, the
failure to comply with the notice u/s 142(1) issued by AO has occurred due
to hospitalization and demise of regular counsel of assessee. This very
reasoning was also mentioned by assessee in the “Statement of Facts” filed
to the CIT(A) in Form No. 35 and also raised in Ground No. 1.1 before us (re-
produced above). The reasoning given by assessee remains uncontroverted
by revenue. We agree that the reasoning given by assessee constituted a
‘reasonable cause’ of failure on the part of assessee and the assessee
deserves benefit of section 273B as noted above. Accordingly, giving the
benefit of section 273B to assessee, we quash the penalty imposed by AO
and allow this appeal of assessee. The assessee succeeds in this appeal.
Page 3 of 4
RSRG Devbuild Private Limited ITA No.6/Ind/2025 Assessment year 2014-15
Resultantly, this appeal of assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17/07/2025
Sd/- Sd/-
(PARESH M.JOSHI) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore िदनांक/Dated : 17.07.2025 Patel/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Sr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 4 of 4
