CHANDRA KATARIA,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 3(3), BHOPAL

PDF
ITA 586/IND/2024Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 July 2025AY 2010-20111 pages
AI SummaryN/A

Facts

The assessee filed a return for AY 2010-11, which was later re-opened under Section 147. The AO made an addition of 'notional interest income' of Rs. 12,87,000. The CIT(A) initially upheld this addition in an ex-parte order.

Held

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) subsequently passed a rectification order under Section 154, deleting the entire addition and granting full relief to the assessee. Therefore, the appeal was considered infructuous.

Key Issues

Whether the addition of notional interest income made by the AO can be sustained when the CIT(A) has subsequently granted full relief through a rectification order.

Sections Cited

139, 147, 148, 143(3), 250, 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI

आदेश/ O R D E R

Per B.M. Biyani, AM:

The captioned two appeals have been filed by assessee against the very same order of first-appeal passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Mumbai [“CIT(A)”] u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”], which in turn arise out of assessment-order dated 26.12.2017 passed by ITO-3(3), Bhopal [“AO”] u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2010-11.

2.

The brief facts are such that the assessee-individual filed her return of income of AY 2010-11 u/s 139 on 29.03.2011 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,29,230/- which was assessed. Subsequently, the AO, based on certain

Page 1 of 5

Chandra Kataria ITA Nos.586 & 655/Ind/2024 AYs: 2010-2011 information regarding deposits in assessee’s bank a/c, re-opened assessee’s

case u/s 147 through notice dated 27.03.2017 u/s 148. Finally, the AO

completed re-opened assessment vide order dated 26.12.2017 after making

an addition of ‘notional interest income’ of Rs. 12,87,000/-. Aggrieved, the

assessee carried matter in first-appeal. The CIT(A) passed order dated

14.06.2024 ex-parte to assessee wherein he upheld the addition made by

AO. Now, the assessee has come in next appeal before ITAT.

ITA No. 655/Ind/2024:

3.

Ld. AR for assessee submitted that the assessee/appellant has due to

oversight filed two appeals against the very same order of CIT(A). Therefore,

one of these two captioned appeals may be dismissed straightaway. Ld. DR for revenue instantly agreed. In view of this, we dismiss the 2nd appeal

being ITA No. 655/Ind/2024.

ITA No. 586/Ind/2024:

4.

In so far this appeal is concerned, Ld. AR submitted that the issue

relates to the addition of Rs. 12,87,000/- made by AO on account of

‘notional interest income’. Ld. AR pointed out that in the impugned order of

first-appeal which is passed ex-parte to assessee, the CIT(A) has upheld the

addition made by AO but subsequently the assessee has filed a rectification

application u/s 154 to CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) has passed a very recent

order dated 24.03.2025 u/s 154 r.w.s. 250 deleting the addition of Rs.

12,87,000/- in entirety and giving full relief to assessee. Ld. AR has filed a

Page 2 of 5

Chandra Kataria ITA Nos.586 & 655/Ind/2024 AYs: 2010-2011 copy of the order passed by CIT(A). For reference, the first page and last

page of the order passed by CIT(A) are scanned and re-produced below:

Page 3 of 5

Chandra Kataria ITA Nos.586 & 655/Ind/2024 AYs: 2010-2011

5.

Therefore, Ld. AR submitted that there is no surviving grievance to

assessee. Ld. AR prayed this bench to close this appeal accordingly. Ld. DR

for revenue instantly agreed.

Page 4 of 5

Chandra Kataria ITA Nos.586 & 655/Ind/2024 AYs: 2010-2011 6. In view of the fact that the CIT(A) has also granted full relief to

assessee and the assessee does not have any surviving grievance, this

appeal becomes infructuous/meritless and the same is also dismissed. We

only direct the AO to give effect to the latest order dated 24.03.2025 passed

by CIT(A) u/s 154 r.w.s. 250 and accordingly delete the addition made in

assessment-order.

7.

Resultantly, both of these appeals are dismissed.

Order pronounced in open court on 24/07/2025

Sd/- Sd/-

(PARESH M. JOSHI) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Indore

िदनांक/ Dated : 24/07/2025

Patel/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYSr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore

Page 5 of 5

CHANDRA KATARIA,BHOPAL vs INCOME TAX OFFICER 3(3), BHOPAL | BharatTax