AROLEEN SOFTECH AND ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 1(1), INDORE, INDORE
Facts
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) on the grounds that the assessee failed to appear or provide supporting documents. The assessment order was passed ex-parte under Section 144/147 of the Income Tax Act, making additions for unexplained income and undisclosed profit.
Held
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Ld. CIT(A) for de novo consideration. This was based on the assessee's expressed intent to pursue the appeal with sincerity and the agreement of both the Ld. AR and Ld. DR.
Key Issues
Whether the ex-parte assessment and appellate orders were valid when the assessee claims lack of proper opportunity and that the company was non-existent at the time of reassessment initiation. Whether the case should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Sections Cited
253, 1961, 144, 147, 246A, 250, 148, 149, 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section 253 of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for
sake of brevity) before this Tribunal. The assessee is aggrieved by
the order bearing Number ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1070645536(1) dated 26.11.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)
u/s 250 of the Act which is hereinafter referred to as the
“Impugned order”. The relevant Assessment Year is 2013-14
Page 1 of 7
Aroleen Softech and Engineering Private Limited ITA No.116/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2013-14
and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2012 to
31.03.2013.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2.1 That as and by way of an assessment order made u/s
144/147 of the Act, income of the assessee was computed and
assessed at Rs.2,57,810/-. Income as per Return of Income was
Rs.1036/-. Additions of Rs.2,31,659/- was added as and by
way of unexplained income (Accommodation entry) and
Rs.25,115/- as and by way of undisclosed profit. That the
aforesaid assessment order is dated 14.11.2019 which is
hereinafter referred to as “impugned assessment order”.
2.2 That the assessee being aggrieved by the aforesaid
“impugned assessment order” prefers first appeal u/s 246A of
the Act before Ld. CIT(A) who by the “impugned order” has
dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the grounds and reasons
specified therein. The core finding of Ld. CIT(A) is reproduced
below:
“7. During the course of appellate proceedings, no reply has been filed by the appellant. I have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and considered the facts of the case. The Assessing Officer has passed a speaking order with detailed discussion on the issues involved therein. The appellant has not pursued the appeal despite being granted several opportunities through notices u/s 250 of the I.T. Act. No details, documents or
Page 2 of 7
Aroleen Softech and Engineering Private Limited ITA No.116/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2013-14
submissions have been provided by the appellant substantiating its grounds of appeal. Moreover, mere facts mentioned in Form No. 35 cannot be considered in the absence of any supporting documentary evidence and submissions.
The AO has passed a reasoned and speaking order considering all the facts and the circumstances of the case. Also, the appellant has failed to bring anything on record to support its grounds of appeal and to counter the additions made by the A.O. Therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the A.O. Hence, the appeal filed by the appellant is dismissed.
In result, the appeal filed by the appellant is dismissed”.
2.3 That the assessee being aggrieved by the “impugned order”
has preferred the instant second appeal before this Tribunal and
has raised following grounds of appeal in Form No.36 against the
“impugned order” which are as under:-
“1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC ['the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC'] has erred in upholding the Order of the Ld. Income Tax Officer - 1(1), Indore (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ld. AO') by confirming the additions of Rs. 2,56,774/- made by the Ld. AO, which is wrong and contrary to the facts of the case and provisions of the Act. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has erred in upholding the additions made by the Ld. AO made vide Ex-Parte Assessment Order dated 14.11.2019, without providing proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard and thus, the Ex-Parte Order of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC is liable to be set aside. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has erred in upholding the reassessment order without appreciating that the assessee company has already been struck off by RoC and is not in existence as on the date of initiation of the reassessment proceedings and any order passed upon non- existent entity is invalid and the reassessment proceedings are void ab initio. Thus, the reassessment order dated 14.11.2019 is liable to be quashed and the reassessment proceedings are liable to be set aside.
Page 3 of 7
Aroleen Softech and Engineering Private Limited ITA No.116/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2013-14
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not quashing the reassessment proceedings without appreciating that the reassessment proceedings are not in accordance with the provisions of Section 147, Section 148, Section 149 and Section 151 of the Act. Thus, the reassessment proceedings are liable to be set aside. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or withdraw any of the grounds of appeal”.
Record of Hearing
3.1 The hearing in the matter took place before this Tribunal on
24.07.2025 when the Ld. AR for and on behalf of the assessee
appeared before us and interalia contended that basis an
application dated 21.07.2025 that there are in all four appeals
including the instant appeal for different years and hence all
should be heard together along with instant appeal which are
listed for 13.08.2025. However only one appeal that is instant
appeal is listed for hearing today i.e. ITA No.116/Ind/2025 for
the Assessment Year 2013-14. The remaining three appeals are
for Assessment Year 2012-13, Assessment Year 2013-14 and
Assessment Year 2014-15. However after some debate and
discussion the Ld. AR made a statement that he is not pressing
for adjournment. Hence the instant appeal was taken up for
hearing with the consent of Ld. DR for the revenue.
Page 4 of 7
Aroleen Softech and Engineering Private Limited ITA No.116/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2013-14
3.2 The Ld. AR then interalia contended that the “impugned
assessment order” is u/s 144 of the Act. In so far as
“impugned order” is concerned our attention was invited to
Form No.35 wherein on page 1 of the form which has details of
the assessee the e-mail id provided was of assessee’s previous
counsel which was satnam.sheetal@gmail.com and that was for
communication purpose of notice(s) etc. Even at para 17 of Form
35 which deals with the address to which notices may be sent to
the appellant the e-mail address was of the previous counsel of
the assessee which was satnam.sheetal@gmail.com. It was fairly
submitted by the Ld. AR that certain adjournments were indeed
taken but the assessee’s intention and attitude was to comply
with the notices always and to cooperate with the authorities in a
bonafide manner. The Ld. AR prayed that matter be set aside
and then remand to Ld. CIT(A) for denovo consideration. The Ld.
DR appearing for and on behalf of the revenue stated that
revenue has no objection if the Tribunal set aside’s the
“impugned order” and remand the case back to the file of Ld.
CIT(A) for denovo consideration.
Page 5 of 7
Aroleen Softech and Engineering Private Limited ITA No.116/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2013-14
Observations,findings & conclusions.
4.1 We now have to decide the legality, validity and the
proprietary of the “Impugned Order” basis records of the case
and rival contentions canvassed before us.
4.2 We have carefully perused the records of the case.
4.3 We basis records of the case and after hearing and upon
examining the contentions are of the considered opinion that the
“impugned order” should be set aside as is prayed for by both
the Ld. AR and the Ld. DR. Accordingly we set aside the
“impugned order” and remand the case to Ld. CIT(A) for denovo
consideration. In both the orders of lower authority we find that
the assessee has remained absent consequently determination of
income has taken place basis material on record but now the
assessee has expressed that they have all the intent to proceed
with 1st appeal with all sincerity, hence we set aside the
“impugned order” as the Ld. AR & the Ld. DR are near
unanimous for a denovo adjudication by the Ld. CIT(A).
Order
5.1 In the premises the “impugned order” is set aside as and
by way of remand to the file of Ld. CIT(A) on denovo basis.
Page 6 of 7
Aroleen Softech and Engineering Private Limited ITA No.116/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2013-14
5.2 In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for
statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 28.07.2025.
Sd/- Sd/-
(B.M. BIYANI) (PARESH M JOSHI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Indore िदनांक / Dated : 28/07/2025 Dev/Sr. PS
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File
By order COPY Senior Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 7 of 7
