SHREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTION,INDORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-(2), INDORE , INDORE
Page 1 of 3
आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, इंदौरɊायपीठ, इंदौर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
INDORE BENCH, INDORE
BEFORE SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.863 to 867/Ind/2024
Assessment Year:2011-12 to 2013-14,2009-10 & 2010-11
&
Assessment Year:2008-09
Shree Balaji Construction,
1, North Hathipala,
Indore
बनाम/
Vs.
ACIT (2)
Indore
(Assessee/Appellant)
(Revenue/Respondent)
PAN: AAHFB3334R
Assessee by Shri Anil Kamal Garg, AR
Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing
01.10.2025
Date of Pronouncement
10.10.2025
आदेश/ O R D E R
Per Bench:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 28.08.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 30.12.2016 passed by learned
ACIT-Central (2), Indore [“AO”] u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3) of Income-tax Act,
1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Years [“AY”] 2008-09 to 2013-14, the Shree Balaji Construction
ITA No. 863 to 867/Ind/2024 & ITANo.869/Ind/2024
AYs: 2011-12 to 2013-14,2009-10 & 2010-11 & 2008-09
Page 2 of 3
assessee has filed the captioned six (6) appeals on the grounds mentioned in respective Appeal Memos (Form No. 36).
2. Ld. AR for assessee submits that the CIT(A), while conducting first- appeal, has served notices of hearing on e-mail of assessee although the assessee has specifically mentioned “No” in the column provided in Form No.
35
asking
“Whether notices/communication may be sent on email?”.
Therefore, the assessee demanded physical hearing from CIT(A) but against the demand of assessee, the CIT(A) issued all notices through e-mail. Hence, in absence of service through physical mode as per demand of assessee in Form No. 35, the assessee could not attend hearings fixed by CIT(A) which has led to the passing of ex-parte order by CIT(A). Ld. AR acknowledges that the assessee is ready and willing to make a proper representation before
CIT(A) if an opportunity is given and prays that the present matters should be remanded to the file of CIT(A) for a proper adjudication of the grounds/issues raised by assessee in first-appeal. Ld. AR also filed a copy of recent order dated 23.06.2025 passed by ITAT, Ahmedabad in ITA No.
2155/Ahd/2024,
Commissioner of Income-tax, in which the case was remanded to CIT(A) in identical circumstance.
3. Ld. DR for revenue agrees with the prayer of Ld. AR but makes a request to direct the assessee to represent cases before CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary adjournments.
Shree Balaji Construction
ITA No. 863 to 867/Ind/2024 & ITANo.869/Ind/2024
AYs: 2011-12 to 2013-14,2009-10 & 2010-11 & 2008-09
Page 3 of 3
4. In view of above submissions of parties; having regard to the principle of natural justice and also bearing in mind that no prejudice would be caused to revenue if the present matters are restored at the level of CIT(A), we remand these matters back to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication afresh.
The CIT(A) shall give necessary opportunity of hearing to assessee and pass appropriate order(s) uninfluenced by his earlier order. The assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and ensure participation in the hearings as may be fixed by CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary adjournments failing which the CIT(A) shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order(s) in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.
5. Resultantly, these appeals are allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 10/10/2025 (PARESH M. JOSHI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore
िदनांक/Dated :
10/10/2025
Patel/Sr. PS
Copies to:
(1)
The appellant
(2)
The respondent
(3)
CIT
(4)
CIT(A)
(5)
Departmental Representative
(6)
Guard File
By order
UE COPYSr. Private Secretary
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Indore Bench, Indore