LATE SHRI KHEMRAJ PATIDAR (THROUGH WIFE AND LEGAL HEIR SMT. BHAGWATI PATIDAR),BHOPAL vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, 2(4), BHOPAL, BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's objections regarding the cost of acquisition and the nature of agricultural land, remanding these issues to the AO. The issue of cash deposit was also remanded for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file a return for AY 2012-13. The AO initiated reassessment proceedings based on information about a land sale and a cash deposit. The assessee failed to comply with notices, leading to a best judgment assessment with additions for the sale value and cash deposit.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition on account of capital gains was justified without considering the cost of acquisition and the nature of agricultural land. Whether the cash deposit in the bank account was correctly treated as unexplained income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 147,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 50C,Section 48,Section 55(2)(b)(i),Section 2(14)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
## आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण**,** इंदौर Ɋायपीठ**,** इंदौर **IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE**
## **BEFORE SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND**
# **SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER**
**ITA No.748/Ind/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13**
| Late<br>Shri<br>Khemraj<br>Patidar,<br>(Through<br>wife<br>and<br>legal<br>heir<br>Smt.<br>Bhagwati<br>Patidar), | | बनाम/<br>Vs. | ITO<br>2(4)<br>Bhopal | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------| | Bhopal | | | | | (Assessee/Appellant) | | | (Revenue/Respondent) | | PAN:<br>CBXPK1838C |
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026