SHRI OMPRAKASH CHOUDHARY,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INDORE
Page 1 of 7
आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, इंदौरɊायपीठ, इंदौर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
INDORE BENCH, INDORE
BEFORE SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Assessment Year:2011-12
Shri Omprakash
Choudhary,
309 Nihalpur Mundi
Bijalpur Road,
Indore
बनाम/
Vs.
ITO
Indore
(Assessee/Appellant)
(Revenue/Respondent)
PAN: BZLPC8125M
Assessee by Shri S.K. Porwal, AR
Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing
17.11.2025
Date of Pronouncement
28.11.2025
आदेश/ O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 09.01.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 23.12.2018 passed by learned
ITO-2(4), Indore [“AO”] u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”]
for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2011-12, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
Shri Omprakash Choudhary
ITA No. 332/Ind/2025 - AY 2011-12
Page 2 of 7
2. The registry has informed that the present appeal is belatedly filed after expiry of statutory time and therefore time-barred. Ld. AR for assessee submitted that the assessee has filed a condonation-application/affidavit; the same is scanned and re-produced below:
Shri Omprakash Choudhary
ITA No. 332/Ind/2025 - AY 2011-12
Page 3 of 7
Shri Omprakash Choudhary
ITA No. 332/Ind/2025 - AY 2011-12
Page 4 of 7
Shri Omprakash Choudhary
ITA No. 332/Ind/2025 - AY 2011-12
Page 5 of 7
He further submitted that the sole reason of delay is as explained in the condonation-application. Ld. AR very humbly submitted that there is no lethargy, negligence, mala fide intention or ulterior motive of assessee in making delay and the assessee does not stand to derive any benefit because of delay. He prayed to condone delay. Ld. DR for Revenue left the matter to the wi om of Bench without raising any objection. We have considered the explanation advanced by assessee in application/affidavit and in absence of any contrary fact or material on record, the assessee is found to have a “sufficient cause” for delay in filing present appeal. We find that section 253(5) of the Act empowers the ITAT to admit an appeal after expiry of prescribed time, if there is a “sufficient cause” for not presenting appeal within prescribed time. It is also a settled position by Hon’ble Supreme
1353, 1987 2 SCC 387 that whenever substantial justice and technical considerations are opposed to each other, the cause of substantial justice must be preferred by adopting a justice-oriented approach. Thus, taking into account the facts of case, the provision of section 253(5) and the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court, we take a judicious view, condone delay, admit appeal and proceed with hearing.
3. On merit of case, it emerged on perusal of assessment-order that the AO has made addition of Rs. 74,24,044/- consisting of deposits of Rs.
74,00,100/- in bank a/c deemed as unexplained credit (+) interest of Rs.
Shri Omprakash Choudhary
ITA No. 332/Ind/2025 - AY 2011-12
Page 6 of 7
23,944/- earned by assessee from bank a/c. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee is not a return filer and the assessee is engaged mainly in agricultural activity, therefore the assessee was not able to represent his case before AO which had led the AO to deem the deposits in bank a/c as unexplained credit.
However, the assessee has now compiled all details/documents for satisfaction of AO and therefore ready and willing to make a proper representation before
AO if an opportunity is given.
Accordingly, Ld. AR prays that the present matter should be remanded to the file of AO for adjudication afresh.
4. Ld. DR for revenue submitted that he would not have any objection if the bench takes a call to remand this matter to AO. However, he makes a request to direct the assessee to represent his case before AO and do not seek unnecessary adjournments.
5. In view of above submissions of parties; having regard to the principle of natural justice and also bearing in mind that no prejudice would be caused to revenue if the present matter is restored at the level of AO, we remand this matter back to the file of AO for adjudication afresh, at the risk and responsibility of assessee. The AO shall give necessary opportunity of hearing to assessee and pass an appropriate order uninfluenced by his earlier order. The assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and ensure participation in the hearings as may be fixed by AO and do not seek unnecessary adjournments failing which the AO shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.
Shri Omprakash Choudhary
ITA No. 332/Ind/2025 - AY 2011-12
Page 7 of 7
6. Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 28/11/2025 (PARESH M. JOSHI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore
िदनांक/Dated : 28/11/2025
Patel/Sr. PS
Copies to:
(1)
The appellant
(2)
The respondent
(3)
CIT
(4)
CIT(A)
(5)
Departmental Representative
(6)
Guard File
By order
UE COPY