TEJENDER PAL SINGH SAHNI,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO failed to properly examine the gift transactions despite all relevant material being on record. The Tribunal found the donor to be a person of means and accepted the assessee's contentions regarding the gifts.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was subject to a search and seizure operation, leading to reassessment. The ITAT had previously set aside the matter for verification of gift sources. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions under Section 69, which were confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made under Section 69 for unexplained investment were justified, considering the verification of gift sources as directed by the ITAT. Whether the assessment order was time-barred and if the AO exceeded jurisdiction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69,Section 144,Section 153A,Section 142(1),Section 254
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, JAIPUR
Before: Dr. S. SEETHALAKSHMI & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: These two appeals by assessee are directed against the order of Ld. CIT (A), Udaipur-2 dated 28.08.2024 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2016-17. In ITA No. 1147/JP/2024, the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
That as Assessment Order u/s. 144 of the Act dated 22/06/2021 is time barred u/s. 153(3) of the Act, it is prayed that same be quashed.
That on account of non-compliance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act dated 20/04/2021 fixing hearing on 23/04/2021 Assessment Order u/s. 144/254(2) of the Act is passed on 22/06/2021. As the ord
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026