SABOO INDUSTRIES,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, CIRCLE- 1, JAIPUR

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR

Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k
BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 331/JPR/2024
fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2015-16

M/s Saboo Industries
D-5, Kalwad Scheme, Near Gopal
Circle-1,
Jaipur.

LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAVFM5882D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Amit Kothari, C.A. (Th. V.C.) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-Proxy-DR a lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 16/01/2025
mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 17/01/2025

vkns'k@ ORDER

PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the ld.
CIT(A) dated 03-02-2024, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi
[ hereinafter referred to as (NFAC) ] for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. At the outset, we note that the assessee has opted for “Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme-2024” to settle its outstanding tax demand. The assessee has filed a copy of Form 2 dated 17.12.2024 issued by the ld. Pr.CIT,
Jaipur-1 designated authority under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024”. It M/s Saboo Industries vs. DCIT
2
appears that the assessee has shown interest to pay the tax amount under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024” as per Form 2 issued by the Department.
3. On the other hand ld. DR has submitted that the Department has no objection if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed being not maintainable once the assessee is interested to settle the dispute under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024”.
4. In view of the fact that the assessee has opted for “Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme-2024” to settle its disputed tax liability for the year under consideration and the Department has issued Form 2 dated
17.12.2024. The present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn however, the parties are at liberty to approach the tribunal if there is any discrepancy in respect of the settlement of the tax liability.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as having been withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 17/01/2025. ¼jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½

¼MkWa-,l-lhrky{eh½
(RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI)

(Dr. S. Seethalakshmi) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member
Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 17/01/2025
*Santosh
M/s Saboo Industries vs. DCIT
3
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- M/s Saboo Industries, Jaipur.
2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- DCIT, Circle-1, Jaipur.
3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT
4. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT(A)
5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत.
6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File { ITA No. 331/JPR/2024}

vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत