DEEPAK BANSAL,KISHANGARH vs. ITO, KISHANGARH

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR

Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k
BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 304/JP/2017
fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2007-08

Shri Deepak Bansal
C/o Shri D.K. Mathur
Ward - -2
Kishangarh
LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AIMPB 1646 H vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@Assessee by : Shri Komal Harsh, Advocate jktLo dh vksj ls@Revenue by: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing

: 05/02/2025

mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 05 /02/2025

vkns'k@ORDER

PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld.
CIT(A), Ajmer dated 25-10-2016 for the assessment year 2007-08 raising the grounds appeal as mentioned at Form 36. 2.1
During the course of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee has opted to settle dispute under Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme 2024 and he has been awaiting the acceptance thereof by the competent authority for which the assessee has filed the copy of Form 1 DTVSV
2024 under the scheme made before the competent authority.

2
SHRI DEEPAK BANSAL VS ITO, WARD-2 KISHANGANJ
2.2
On the other hand, the ld. DR did not raise any objection to the submissions made by the assessee before the Bench.
2.3
After hearing the both the parties and perusing the materials available on record, it is found that the assessee is himself interested in withdrawing the appeal by settling the dispute, under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024. The Bench further feels that in case of another reasons the dispute is not settled in Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme 2024, the assessee shall be at liberty to apply for restoration of the appeal in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, the Bench allows the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee on above count.
3.0. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed having been withdrawn

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 05 -02-2025. ¼ Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh ½

¼ jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½
(Dr. S. Seethalakshmi)

(Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai)
U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member
Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 05 /02/2025

*Mishra
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
1. The Appellant- Shri Deepak Bansal, Nagaur ,.
2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ITO, Ward – 2, Kishangargh
3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT
4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत
5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No.304/JP/2017) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत