VIMLA DEVI JAIN (DECEASED) THROUGH DEVENDRA JAIN (SON),AJMER vs. ITO, WARD 1(2), AJMER, AJMER
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2011-12. During the course of the hearing, the assessee's AR prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and if so, what is the consequence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1505/JP/2024
ORDER PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 14-11-2024, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ hereinafter referred to as (NFAC) ] for the assessment year 2011-12 raising the grounds appeal as mentioned at Form 36. 2.1 During the course of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal vide application dated 30-01-2024 on the ground as under:- ‘’The appellant has preferred petition before the ld.PCIT, Udaipur under DTVSV Act, 1024 for settling the order being agitated in this appeal and the ld.PCIT has issued form 2 also and the appellant has deposited amount SMT. VIMLA DEVI JAIN(DECEASED) THRU’ SHRI DEVENRA JAIN (SON) VS ITO, WARD 1(2) AJMER determined therein and hence the appellant wishes to withdraw this appeal as per provisions of DTVSV Act, 2024. Your honour is sincerely requested to permit withdrawal of the instant appeal and oblige.’’ 2.2 On the other hand, the ld. DR did not raise any objection to the submissions made by the ld. AR of the assessee before the Bench. 2.3 After hearing both the parties and perusing the materials available on record, it is found that the assessee is herself interested in withdrawing the appeal by settling the dispute, under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024. The Bench further feels that in case of another reasons the dispute is not settled in Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, the assessee shall be at liberty to apply for restoration of the appeal in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, the Bench allows the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee on above count. 3.0. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed having been withdrawn Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24 -02-2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026