M/S NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(1)(1), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal due to the APA. The departmental representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. Subsequently, the assessee entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the CBDT. The assessee then requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after entering into an APA with the CBDT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ C ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K. GARODIA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
PER SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM :
The assessee has filed an appeal against the assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) Dt.30.07.2018 in pursuance to the directions of Dispute Resolution Panel under Section 144C(5) of the Act Dt.26.06.2018.
2 IT(TP)A No.2715/Bang/2018 2. We found the learned Authorized Representative of the assessee, has sent a letter for withdrawal of Appeal pursuant to signing of APA through e-mail dt.4.7.2020, in view of the assessee entering into Bilateral as well as Unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement(APA) with the CBDT on 26.06.2020, the copy of the letter is extracted as under :
3 IT(TP)A No.2715/Bang/2018
Contra, the learned departmental representative has no objection for the withdrawal of the appeal.
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In view of submission of e-mail letter dt.4.7.2020 for withdrawal of appeal by the assessee, the appeal is treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
4 IT(TP)A No.2715/Bang/2018 4. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026