BALAJI ENTERPRICES,CHENNAI vs. ITO,NON-CORPORATE WARD-7(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the delay was not condoned, and the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for AY 1985-86 with a delay of over 30 years. The assessee sought condonation of delay to avail benefits under the Voluntary Scheme for Settlement of Disputes (VSVS) 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned to avail a settlement scheme, and if the reasons provided constitute sufficient cause.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ C ” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश/ O R D E R
PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- II, Chennai in dated 29.10.1990 for the assessment year 1985-86.
:-2-: ITA No: 27/Chny/2021
M/s. Balaji Enterprises, C/o. MJ Dayanandam, the assessee, filed this appeal with a delay of 10999 days ( 30 years 3 months). The case was heard through video conferencing. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee came to know that the Government of India has introduced the VSVS Scheme 2020 for all the assessees whose appeals are pending before the appropriate authority for closure of the case permanently by availing this scheme. The assessee came to know about this scheme and filed this appeal on 09.02.2021 with the delay of filing the appeal by 10999 (30 years 3 months) to avail the benefit of the scheme and hence pleaded to condone the delay submitting that the delay in filing the appeal happened because of closure of the firm’s business and the tax was determined, whereby, the department made the ex-partner MJ Dayanandam to pay all the taxes and his properties were attached till date. Since, the legal representative has suggested to utilise the benefit under VSVS scheme, the assessee is seeking condonation to avail the benefit and hence pleaded that the delay in filing the appeal be condoned. Per contra, the Ld. DR submitted that there is no sufficient reason for the inordinate delay in filing the appeal and hence it may not be condoned.
We heard the rival parties. We find that there is no sufficient cause for filing this appeal with a delay of 10999 days (30 years 3 months). Therefore, we do not condone the delay and hence the appeal is dismissed.
:-3-: ITA No: 27/Chny/2021
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 08th April, 2021 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026