M/S.TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPN. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2261/CHNY/2016Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 April 2021AY 2005-063 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, allowing the assessee to pursue settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeal if the scheme application was rejected.

What were the facts?

The assessee wished to settle pending direct tax disputes under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. They had filed initial forms and were awaiting further communication from the designated authority.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be kept pending when the assessee intends to settle the dispute under a tax settlement scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN

For Respondent: Shri. G. Chandrababu, Addl. CIT
Hearing: 30.03.2021Pronounced: 08.04.2021

आदेश/ O R D E R

PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is against order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Chennai in & 165/2013-14/CIT(A)-11 dated 22.04.2016 for the assessment year 2005-06.

:-2-: ITA No: 2261/Chny/2016

2.

The above case was heard through video conferencing. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wanted to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ to settle pending dispute relating to Direct Taxes and in this regard the assessee has filed form No 1 and 2 and awaiting for form No. 3 from the designated authority.

3.

The Bench has considered rival contentions of both sides and after hearing both parties, we find that the assessee has filed form no 1 and 2 and awaiting for form no. 3 from the designated authority. Therefore, once the assessee filed a declaration in Form No.1 along with undertaking and expressed their willingness to settle pending disputes regarding direct taxes, then there is no point in keeping the appeal filed by the assessee. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal filed the assessee, supra, as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee to restore the appeal, in the event of the Designated Authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the assessee under section 4 of the said Act. We, further make it clear that if the assessee has for any reason opted out from the scheme or the applicant under the scheme misrepresent any fact which resulted in rejection of application filed under the scheme, then the provisions of section 4(6) of the Act, shall be applicable to such appeal and in such case, the proceedings and the claims which were withdrawn under section 4 and all the consequences under the Income-tax Act against the declarant assessee shall be deemed to :-3-: ITA No: 2261/Chny/2016 have been revived. We, further make it clear that the assessee should promptly inform the Assessing Officer about their decision to opt out of the scheme or rejection of application by the designated authority to the Assessing Officer, so as to enable to file miscellaneous application to restore the appeals.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on 08th April, 2021 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 4

All 1,145 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →