ACIT-27(3), MUMBAI vs. SMT.SOSARDEVI GANESHLAL KACHHARA, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals as not maintainable. This decision was based on a mutual agreement between the parties to follow a CBDT circular directing withdrawal of appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50,00,000.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The appeals arose from assessment orders passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeals before the Tribunal in light of a CBDT circular regarding tax effect thresholds for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
(Assessment Year : 2008-09) & (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Assistant Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Sosardevi Ganeshlal Income Tax-27(3), Kachhara Mumbai 903, Kailash Towers R.No.423, 4th Floor Vallabh Baug Lane Tower No.6, Vashi Railway Ghatkopar (E) Station, Vashi Mumbai – 400 077 Navi Mumbai – 400 703 PAN/GIR No.AGPPK2410B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Revenue by Shri T.S. Khalsa, Sr.AR Assessee by None Date of Hearing 17/11/2020 Date of Pronouncement 17/11/2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
These appeals in ITA N.4412/Mum/2018 for A.Y.2008-09 & 2009-10 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-25, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-25/IT-91,90/2015-16
Smt. Sosardevi Ganeshlal Kachhara & CIT(A)-25/IT-427,428 & 429/16-17 dated 04/04/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 04/04/2018 by the ld. ACIT-27(3), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
Both the parties before us mutually agreed that these revenue appeals are to be dismissed as not maintainable in view of the recent Circular issued by the CBDT dated 08/08/2019 wherein the revenue has been directed to withdraw the appeal preferred by it before the Tribunal if the tax effect on the disputed issues is less than or equal to Rs.50,00,000/-. It is well settled that this Circular is binding on the revenue authorities.
Respectfully following the said Circular, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed as not maintainable.
Incase, if the revenue is able to provide evidence that the cases fall under any of the exceptions provided in the circular issued by the CBDT, then the revenue may prefer miscellaneous application for recalling of this order, if they so desire, in which circumstance this order shall be recalled by this Tribunal.
In the result, appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed as not maintainable.
Order pronounced on 17/11/2020 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026