SAKAL MARATHA SAMAJ,AHMEDNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 286/PUN/2021Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 July 20223 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(Exemption) had not decided on the objects of the trust and had dismissed the appeal ex-parte. Therefore, the assessee should be given an opportunity to be heard on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application due to incomplete submissions. The assessee appealed this decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the application for registration under section 12AA without a decision on merits and without a proper opportunity of hearing is justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”

Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

For Respondent: Shri Rajarshi Dwivedy - DR
Hearing: 07/07/2022Pronounced: 08/07/2022

ORDER

PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:

1.

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune passed under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter also called as “the Act”] dated 26.02.2020.

2.

Briefly stated facts of the case are that the appellant assessee made an online application in Form 10A for approval of the Trust/Institution under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 07.08.2019. The applicant is registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 with Registration No:MAH/4/2/2019/AHMEDNAGAR dated 19.06.2019. The ld.CIT(E) asked the assessee to upload certain information/clarification in order to process the application. Sakal Maratha Samaj Vs. CIT(E) [A] However, the ld.CIT(Exemption) observed that submission uploaded by assessee was incomplete, hence, the ld.ICT(E) rejected application for the grant of registration under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Aggrieved by the order of ld.CIT(Exemption), the assessee has approached the Tribunal. At the time of hearing of the appeal, none appeared on behalf of the assessee.

4.

We have heard ld.DR for the Revenue and perused the relevant material on record. On perusal of the order of the ld.CIT(E), it is an admitted position that the ld.CIT(E) has not decided issue on objects, instead, he dismissed the appeal ex-parte. Therefore, the assessee, in our view, should not be precluded an opportunity of hearing on merits. In view of the aforementioned reasons, we set-aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the file of the ld.CIT(E) with a direction to dispose of the application afresh on merits as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →