SAKAL MARATHA SAMAJ,AHMEDNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(Exemption) had not decided on the objects of the trust and had dismissed the appeal ex-parte. Therefore, the assessee should be given an opportunity to be heard on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application due to incomplete submissions. The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under section 12AA without a decision on merits and without a proper opportunity of hearing is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune passed under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter also called as “the Act”] dated 26.02.2020.
Briefly stated facts of the case are that the appellant assessee made an online application in Form 10A for approval of the Trust/Institution under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 07.08.2019. The applicant is registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 with Registration No:MAH/4/2/2019/AHMEDNAGAR dated 19.06.2019. The ld.CIT(E) asked the assessee to upload certain information/clarification in order to process the application. Sakal Maratha Samaj Vs. CIT(E) [A] However, the ld.CIT(Exemption) observed that submission uploaded by assessee was incomplete, hence, the ld.ICT(E) rejected application for the grant of registration under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Aggrieved by the order of ld.CIT(Exemption), the assessee has approached the Tribunal. At the time of hearing of the appeal, none appeared on behalf of the assessee.
We have heard ld.DR for the Revenue and perused the relevant material on record. On perusal of the order of the ld.CIT(E), it is an admitted position that the ld.CIT(E) has not decided issue on objects, instead, he dismissed the appeal ex-parte. Therefore, the assessee, in our view, should not be precluded an opportunity of hearing on merits. In view of the aforementioned reasons, we set-aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the file of the ld.CIT(E) with a direction to dispose of the application afresh on merits as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026