LODHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED (SUCCESSOR TO LODHA IDEAL BUIDCON PRIVATE LIMITED SINCE MERGED WITH SURYAKRUPA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-7(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5181/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 December 2020AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal dismissed the appeal, following a Madras High Court decision, because the assessee intended to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the scheme's outcome was unfavorable.

What were the facts?

The assessee was in the process of analyzing the option to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee informed the tribunal about this intention.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal should be dismissed when the assessee intends to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Gogri-Ld. AR
For Respondent: Shri Rajeev Harit -Ld.CIT-DR

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

By way of this appeal, the assessee contests the order of Ld. first appellate authority on certain grounds of appeal.

2.

The Ld. AR placed on record a letter dated 30/11/2020 wherein it has been stated that the assessee is in the process of analyzing the alternative to opt for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme).

2 Assessment Year: 2015-16

3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and in terms of decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in M/s Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) V/s ACIT (TCA NO. 372 of 2020) dated 16/10/2020, the bench deem it fit to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, going by the said decision, since the assessee is opting for VVS Scheme, the appeal stand dismissed. However, the assessee is given liberty to seek restoration of this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration filed by the assessee u/s 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 is not in favor of the assessee. If such prayer is made, the registry shall entertain the prayer forthwith without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request being made by the assessee by filing a miscellaneous application for restoration, the registry shall place such petition before the bench for orders.

4.

In view of the foregoing, the appeal stands dismissed. Order pronounced on 01st December, 2020. (Saktijit Dey) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) "ाियक सद" / Judicial Member लेखा सद" / Accountant Member

मुंबई Mumbai; िदनांकDated : 01/12/2020 Sr.PS:-Jaisy Varghese

3 Assessment Year: 2015-16

आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ"/ The Appellant

1.

""थ"/ The Respondent 2. आयकरआयु"(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. आयकरआयु"/ CIT– concerned 4. िवभागीय"ितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड"फाईल / Guard File 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

उप/सहायकपंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

More judgments on Section 4

All 1,145 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →