BODYRHYTHM ENTERPRISES LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 3(1)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' and sought to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was permitted to be withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against additions made under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had subsequently filed an application under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.1996-1997 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-8/10430/2017-18 dated 28/01/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 22/12/2011 by the ld. ITO 3(1)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
We find that assessee has raised grounds for deletion of addition made u/s.69B of the Act in the sums of Rs.43,03,083/- and Rs.18,66,898/- in its appeal filed before us. We find that the Chartered Accountant of the assessee vide its letter dated 02/12/2020 had submitted in writing that assessee has already filed an application under ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ 2020 by filing Form No.1 and had also given declaration in Form No.2 on 21/09/2020. Further the assessee has also received Form No.3 u/s.5(1) of direct Tax ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ 2020 on 26/11/2020 determining the amount payable by the assessee. Accordingly, the assessee’s authorised representative had sought to withdraw the appeal filed by the assessee before us. The said letter dated 02/12/2020 is taken on record and accordingly in view of assessee availing the direct Tax ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ 2020, the appeal filed by the assessee is permitted to be withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 03/12/2020.
More judgments on Section 69B
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S Rajguru Foods, BijapurITA 77/PAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Alka Ajit Shah, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer Ward 20(1)(1), MumbaiITA 1915/MUM/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Rama Krishna Jewellers Private Limited…ITA 1289/DEL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Front Line Guards Private Limited, Navi… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(1)(1)…ITA 7909/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Haripa Industries, Kolkata vs ITO, Central Circle 4(1), KolkataITA 2283/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026