MANGLA BROTHERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ITO 3 (2)(2), MUMBAI

When the appeal was called for hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee to represent the case. However, the assessee has filed a letter dated 19th November 2020 stating that it wants to avail the option of settling the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

I have heard the learned Departmental Representative and perused the material on record. The Hon’ble Madras High Court in order dated 16.10.2020 in case of M/s Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) v/s ACIT, TCA no.372/2020, has disposed off the appeal filed by the assessee with a direction to file application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Further, the Hon’ble Madras High Court has observed that in the event the declaration filed by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is not in favour of the assessee, it will be open to the assessee to seek restoration of the appeal and on such prayer of the assessee, the Registry will not insist upon filing any application for condonation of delay. In view of the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court, I am inclined to dispose off the present appeal keeping in view the fact that the assessee intends to settle the dispute raised in the present appeal under Vivad Se Vishwas Act,2020. However, I make it clear, in the event of non–acceptance of assessee’s declaration under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee would be at liberty to file a miscellaneous application seeking recall of this order. It is further made clear, the Registry should not insist upon filing any application seeking condonation of delay if there is any delay in filing the miscellaneous application.

In the result, appeal is dismissed with aforementioned liberty.