No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUTANT MEMBER
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 10-08-2018 passed by Ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the addition relating to alleged unaccounted receipts made by the AO. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has filed applications under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and is waiting for the certificate in Khasim Mohammed Waheed Urrehman, Bangalore Page 2 of 3 Form No.3 from the Pr. CIT. Accordingly the Ld A.R submitted that the matter may be kept pending.
The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.
We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
The Ld A.R, however, submitted that the assessee may be given liberty to move application for recall of the order, as the application of the assessee is yet to be accepted by the department. We notice that the assessee has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the Khasim Mohammed Waheed Urrehman, Bangalore Page 3 of 3 tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department. Hence, it appears that the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open Court on 12-08-2020