M/S UNITRANS INFOTECH SERVICES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3225/BANG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 August 2020AY 2012-133 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, noting that no purpose would be served in keeping them pending since the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to move for recall of the order if necessary.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT and subsequently filed applications under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee was awaiting a certificate from the Pr. CIT and requested the appeals be kept pending.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and whether liberty should be granted to recall the order.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE

For Appellant: Shri C. Sandeep, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Sunder Rajan, D.R
Hearing: 17.08.2020Pronounced: 17.08.2020

These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order of CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru dated 24.9.2018 for the assessment years 2013-14, 2013-14 & 2014-15.

2.

At the time of hearing, the Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has filed applications under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and is waiting for the certificate in Form No.3 from the Pr. CIT. Accordingly the Ld A.R submitted that the matter may be kept pending. to 3227/Bang/2018 M/s. Unitrans Infotech Services Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Page 2 of 3

3.

The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeals.

4.

We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant would be moving applications for withdrawing the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn. 5. The Ld A.R, however, submitted that the assessee may be given liberty to move application for recall of the order, as the application of the assessee is yet to be accepted by the department. We notice that the assessee has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department. Hence, it appears that the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeals, the assessee is given liberty to move to 3227/Bang/2018 M/s. Unitrans Infotech Services Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Page 3 of 3 appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so. 6. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 17th Aug’20

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →