M/S SHAKUNTALA POLY INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-10(3), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 204/KOL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 September 2021AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order of the CIT(A) and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment. The Assessing Officer was directed to provide the assessee with a proper opportunity to present their case.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was against an ex-parte order passed by the Assessing Officer and subsequently by the CIT(A). The assessee claimed they were not given adequate opportunity to present their case, despite engaging a counsel.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was denied a proper opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Borad

order

: September 07, 2021 Hearing through Video Conferencing ORDER

Per Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 19.12.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT’) passed u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the impugned 2. order of the Assessing Officer is an ex-parte order. He has further submitted that though the assessee had engaged a counsel namely Shri Santosh Agarwal, FCA, who appeared before the Assessing Officer and furnished the necessary details, however, the Assessing Officer has noted that no details were furnished before him. He has further submitted that the assessee did not receive the notices of the subsequent hearings fixed before the Assessing Officer. The ld. Counsel has further invited our attention to the impugned order of the CIT(A) and submitted that it is also an ex parte order. The ld. Counsel has submitted that the assessee had not been given adequate opportunity to present his case. He, therefore, has requested that the case of the assessee be restored to the file of the Assessment Year: 2014- M/s Shakuntala Poly Industries Pvt. Ltd Assessing Officer for assessment afresh and further that the assessee may be given proper opportunity to present its case.

3.

The ld. DR has not objected to the same.

4.

In view of this, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for assessment afresh on this issue. Needless to say that the Assessing Officer will give proper opportunity to the assessee to present his case. The assessee is also directed to appear and submit the necessary details before the Assessing Officer as and when called for by the Assessing Officer. With the above observation, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 7th September, 2021. Sd/- Sd/- [Manish Borad] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 07.09.2021. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. M/s Shakuntala Poly Industries Pvt. Ltd 2. ITO, Ward-10(3), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR),

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →