SRI. G. DAYANANDA REDDY (HUF),BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 4(3)(4), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and would withdraw the appeal. Therefore, keeping the appeal pending would serve no purpose.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal challenging the reopening of assessment and an addition on account of long-term capital gains. The assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and intended to withdraw the appeal upon receiving Form 3.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's intention to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, rendering the pending appeal moot.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
Per N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President
The assessee has filed this appeal against the order dated 25.10.2019 passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals)-4, Bengaluru relating to the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee has challenged the jurisdiction of reopening of assessment u/s. 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] as well as on merits the addition on account of long term capital gains.
The ld. counsel for the assessee has filed a letter dated 02.09.2020 stating that the assessee has filed Form 1 & Form 2 under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act with respect to this appeal and Form 3 is awaited. Once Form-3 is issued, the assessee will be withdrawing this appeal before the Tribunal. Accordingly, adjournment of the appeal is sought for.
The ld. D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. She submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly she submitted that these appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.
We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, it would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
The assessee has also sought adjournment on the ground that since it has not yet received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by it in Form No.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. On these set of facts, since we have already dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on this 10th day of September, 2020.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaista Praween vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of GST And Central Excise, RourkelaOrissa · 6 Nov 2026
- Paonta Hp Centre vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Multitech Agro INDIA (Opc) PVT LTD vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 5 Nov 2026
- Gopa Satya Madhava Subbarao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Kallu Cable vs. The Commissioner State Goods And Service TaxUttarakhand · 5 Nov 2026