Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, Accountant Member:
These four appeals filed by the revenue are directed against common order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 54, Mumbai, dated 18/12/2017 for the Asst. Years 2008-09,2009-10
2 M/s.Ashar Realtors & 1719,1721/Mum/2018 M/s. Ashar Realty Pvt.Ltd. & 2010-11. Since, facts are identical and issues are common, for the sake of convenience, these appeals were heard together and are disposed-off by this consolidated order.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessee has gone into for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020, therefore, the case may kindly be adjourned.
Since the assessee has gone into for Vivad Se Vishvas Scheme 2020, the adjournment application by the assessee is rejected. We are inclined to dismiss the appeals of the Revenue in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT TCA No.372 of 2020 with the liberty to Revenue to get these appeals recalled in case assessee does not succeed in VSVS 2020. Accordingly, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 23/12/2020