DCIT (E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S PALIWAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A cannot be made while computing book profit under Section 115JB. This issue is covered by a Special Bench decision of the Tribunal.
What were the facts?
The assessee invested a significant amount in shares and securities, from which it derived exempt income. The AO added back expenses related to this exempt income to the book profit under Section 115JB. The CIT(A) deleted this addition.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses relatable to exempt income can be disallowed while computing book profit under Section 115JB. Whether Section 14A is applicable for computation of book profit under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the revenue against impugned order dated 16.8.2016, passed by Ld. CIT (Appeals) 36 New Delhi for the assessment year 2010-11. Grounds raised by the revenue reads as under:- “In the facts and under the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 4,28,65,241/- made by the AO to the book profit u/s 115JB on account of expenditure relatable to income exempt u/s 10 of the Act in view of the provision of section 14A read with clause (f) of explanation 1 to section 115JB.”
The facts in brief are that the qua the issue involved are that, assessee had invested amount of Rs. 49,53,49,937/- in shares, securities and investment in a partnership firm from where assessee has derived exempt income, that is, it does not form part of the total taxable income. AO has made disallowance u/s 14A while computing the book profit u/s 115JB, because the assessment has been on tax computed on book profit u/s 115JB, because the same was higher than the normal provision. Ld. CIT (A) following the ITAT order for the assessment year 2007-08 and 2008-09 has deleted the said disallowance.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026