ARCHANA AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-25(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had complied with the requirements of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if issues arose with the certificate issuance.
What were the facts?
The assessee decided to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed the necessary declarations. However, the Designated Authority had not yet issued the certificate in Form No. 3.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the pending issuance of the certificate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A(SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Kolkata dated 24.04.2019.
In this case, ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee at the time of hearing stated that the assessee has decided to settle the dispute involved in the said appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 but the Designated Authority has not issued the certificate in Form No. 3 as per Section 5(1) of the Scheme so far determining the tax payable by her under the same Scheme.
Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Archna Agarwal
Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, I permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal and dismiss the appeal with the liberty to the assessee that in case, there is any problem in issuance of the certificate in Form No. 3 by the Designated Authority or any other such situation making the assessee not eligible to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the assessee will have the liberty to approach this Tribunal with a request for restoration of this appeal.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on March 04, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026