ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(1), HUBBALLI vs. M/S. VRL LOGISTICS LIMITED, HUBBALLI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s order, finding no new material from the revenue to controvert the earlier decision. Therefore, the revenue's appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in transportation and other businesses, claimed deduction under Section 80IA for carbon credit receipts. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, but the CIT(Appeals) allowed it, relying on a co-ordinate bench decision. The revenue appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether carbon credit receipts are eligible for deduction under Section 80IA. Whether the CIT(Appeals) erred in relying on a previous tribunal decision that was under challenge.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ A ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K. GARODIA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
PER SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM :
The revenue has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Hubli passed under Section 143(3) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act').
The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal :
The Brief facts of the case are. the assessee company is engaged in the business of transportation of goods, courier service, passenger travel and wind power generation of electricity and filed the return of income for the Assessment Year 2014-15 on 26.09.2014. Subsequently, Revised Return was filed declaring
Rs.40,41,69,090/-,and the case was selected for scrutiny, and Notice under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued. In compliance, the learned Authorized Representative appeared from time to time and the case was discussed Whereas,the assessing officer find that the assessee has claimed deduction under Section 80IA of the Act and verified the Audit Report in respect of deduction. But,the Assessing Officer has denied the deduction under Section 80IA of the Act on the Carbon Credit receipts and passed the order under Section 143(3) of the Act dt.30.12.2016. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(Appeals). Whereas, the CIT(Appeals) considering the grounds of appeal
, findings of the Assessing Officer and submissions of the assessee, relying on the decision of co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in assessee own case (ITA No.2783/Bang/2017 Dt.5.9.2018) has granted relief and allowed the appeal of the assessee.Aggrieved by the order of CIT(Appeals), the revenue has filed appeal before the Tribunal.
4. At the time of hearing, the ld. DR submitted that the CIT (Appeals) has erred in granting relief irrespective of the fact that the decision relied on by the CIT (Appeals) has been challenged at higher forums by the revenue. Whereas the learned Authorized Representative supported the orders of the CIT(Appeals) relying on the assessee own case for the A.Y. 2013-14.We found the Ld
CIT(Appeals) has dealt on the disputed issue at page 3 paras 5 & 6 of the order and granted relief which is read as under :
The learned Departmental Representative could not controvert the observations of the CIT(Appeals) with any new or cogent material.Accordingly, we are not inclined to interfere with the order of CIT(Appeals) and uphold the same and dismissed the grounds of appeal of revenue.
In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.
Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026