MANISHA GUPTA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-47(1), KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. This was based on the assessee's compliance with the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the issuance of certificates accepting the declarations.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. The assessee subsequently decided to settle the disputes under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A(SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-
Date of concluding the hearing : March 25, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : March 25, 2021 O R D E R
These appeals being 2509/KOL/2019 filed by the assessee are directed against the orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Kolkata dated 13.09.2019 and 23.10.2019 respectively.
In these cases, Shri K.K. Goswami, ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee has moved an application dated 22.03.2021 seeking withdrawal of these appeals on the ground that the assessee has decided to settle the dispute involved in the said appeals under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 for both the appeals and the Designated 1 & 2509/KOL/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-2013 Manisha Gupta Authority has issued the certificates in Form No. 3 as per Section 5(1) of the Scheme accepting the assessee’s declarations under the same Scheme.
Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the permissions as sought by the ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee are granted and these appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on March 25, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026