DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S MINDA INVESTMENTS LTD., DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lakhs, and the CBDT circular directed not to file or press appeals below this monetary limit. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 1,52,20,137 under section 14A, while the assessee had already disallowed Rs. 35,65,400. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to Rs. 1,06,51,380. The Revenue appealed this reduction.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the tax effect and CBDT circular instructions regarding monetary limits for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “E”: DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-33, New Delhi, Dated 29.11.2016 for the A.Y. 2013-2014.
In this case, the A.O. disallowed Rs.1,52,20,137/- under section 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961. Since the assessee itself has disallowed Rs.35,65,400/- in the computation of 2 ITA.No.306/Del./2017 M/s. Minda Investments Ltd., Delhi. income, therefore, balance amount of Rs.1,16,54,737/- was added to the income of assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) restricted the disallowance under section 14A to Rs.1,06,51,380/- in place of Rs.1,52,20,137/- worked-out by the A.O. The Revenue challenged the Order of Ld. CIT(A) in reducing the addition.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3/2018 Dated 11th July, 2018 issued by CBDT, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed. The Ld. D.R. in view of the Board’s Circular above did not press the Departmental Appeal. The case of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided in the above Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board
3 ITA.No.306/Del./2017 M/s. Minda Investments Ltd., Delhi. instructions referred to above and therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026