VALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the dismissal was a technical default and the assessee was not given an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the case was remanded back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits after the assessee files the appeal electronically.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal manually in paper form, but the CIT(A) dismissed it in limine because it was required to be filed electronically. The assessee argued this was a technical default.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed manually instead of electronically, when electronic filing was mandatory, warrants dismissal in limine without providing an opportunity to the assessee.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Amit Shukla, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Valvoline Cummins Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income 50/8, 1st Floor, Janpath, Tax, Circle-26(1), Tolstoy Lane, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACW0287A Assessee by : Sh. Aditya Vohra, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 02.09.2019 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-9, New Delhi dated 31.01.2017.
The ld. CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee on 05.04.2016 in limine on the grounds that the appeal was required to be filed in electronic form by 15.06.2016 whereas the assessee has filed appeal manually in a paper form. Since, it is a matter of technical default and the assessee has not been provided any opportunity before dismissing the appeal, the matter is being send back to the file of the ld. CIT (A) with directions to the assessee to file appeal before the ld. CIT (A) in an electronic form along with the reasons explaining for not filing the appeal in electronic form which the ld. CIT (A)
2 Valvoline Cummins Pvt. Ltd. shall take on record and adjudicate on merits as per the provisions of the Act.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 02/09/2019).
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026