M/S. BELVALKAR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (1), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found it just and fair to set aside the ex parte order. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for a fresh disposal after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte due to non-appearance. The assessee then appealed this order to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee is sustainable. The procedural fairness in the appellate process.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 15-11-2018 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-13, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2012-13. 2. We have heard the ld. DR and perused the relevant material on record. There is no appearance from the side of the assessee despite notice. It is seen that the ld. CIT(A) passed the order ex- parte qua the assessee and dismissed the appeal. In view of the factual background of the extant case, we are of the opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-aside and the
M/s. Belvalkar Housing Development matter is remitted to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to dispose of the appeal afresh after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. We order accordingly.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 20th April, 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 20th April, 2022 Satish
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent; 3. The CIT(A)-13, Pune The Pr.CIT-2, Pune 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “B” / 5. DR ‘B’, ITAT, Pune गाड� फाईल / Guard file 6.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
M/s. Belvalkar Housing Development
Date 1. Draft dictated on 19-04-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 20-04-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the JM second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second JM Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026