DR R A GENESVARAN,ERODE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, ERODE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was allowed to approach the Tribunal again if any injustice occurred during the settlement process.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 to settle pending tax disputes. In some cases, Form No. 3 was yet to be issued, while in others, it had been issued. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and the implications of such withdrawal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश / O R D E R
PER BENCH :
All these appeals filed by the assessee are against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Coimbatore in 27/17-18, 34/17-18, 35/17-18 & 36/17-18 all dated 27.11.2018 relevant to the Assessment Years 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014. to 264/Chny/2019 :- 2 -: :
When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020. It was further a submission that Form No.3 is yet to be issued by the Designated authority and hence would be submitted in due course and the same shall be furnished after issuance of Form 3. He has further submitted that the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
In this case, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority is yet to issue Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Since, the learned Counsel for the assessee has submitted that Form 3 would be submitted as and when it was issued and prayed for permitting the assessee to withdraw the appeal, the appeal filed by the Assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an to 264/Chny/2019 :- 3 -: appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn. to 264/Chny/2019 :
When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
In all these cases, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form to 264/Chny/2019 :- 4 -: No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, he prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the submissions of the Assessee, the appeal filed by the Assessee are permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020. Thus, the appeals of the Assessee in to 264 /Chny/2019 are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals of the Assessee in to 264 /Chny/2019 are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 18th January, 2021 in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026