SUDESH KUMAR AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-63(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee having complied with the requirements of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal filed before the ITAT. The reason for withdrawal was the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal can be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘(SMC
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, HON’BLE(KZ)]
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH ‘(SMC)’, KOLKATA [BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT (KZ)] [THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT] Assessment Year: 2014-15 Sudesh Kumar Agarwal......................................................................................................Appellant BG-42, Sector-II, Salt Lake City, Kolkata – 700 091. [PAN: ACVPA 5171 F] Vs ITO, Ward – 63(2), Kolkata...................………………….................................................Respondent Appearances by: None appearing on behalf of the Assessee. Shri Jayanta Khanra, JCIT, Sr. DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : May 07, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : May 07, 2021 ORDER
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Kolkata dated 31.07.2019.
In this case, the ld. counsel for the assessee has moved an application dated 22.04.2021 seeking withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that he has decided to settle the dispute involved in the said appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 and the Designated Authority has issued the certificate in Form No. 3 as per Section 5(1) of the Scheme accepting the assessee’s declaration under the said Scheme.
Assessment Year: 20114-15 Sudesh Kumar Agarwal 3. Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the permission as sought by the assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 7th May, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026